Seek Returns logo

CNH vs. RTO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CNH and RTO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CNH is a standard domestic listing, while RTO trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCNHRTO
Company NameCNH Industrial N.V.Rentokil Initial plc
CountryUnited KingdomUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization15.23 billion USD12.40 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 30, 2013November 18, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CNH and RTO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CNH vs. RTO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCNHRTO
5-Day Price Return0.25%-2.47%
13-Week Price Return-10.90%3.18%
26-Week Price Return-2.25%-12.52%
52-Week Price Return22.29%-24.83%
Month-to-Date Return-6.02%-4.27%
Year-to-Date Return7.50%-9.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume10.26M3.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume17.77M4.20M
3-Month Volatility28.62%31.78%
Beta1.550.93

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CNH

10.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

CNH’s Return on Equity of 10.67% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RTO

6.17%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

RTO’s Return on Equity of 6.17% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CNH vs. RTO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CNH

4.55%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s Net Profit Margin of 4.55% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

RTO

5.49%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

RTO’s Net Profit Margin of 5.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CNH vs. RTO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CNH

17.85%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.85% places CNH in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RTO

9.93%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

RTO’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.93% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CNH vs. RTO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCNHRTO
Return on Equity (TTM)10.67%6.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.91%2.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.55%5.49%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.85%9.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)32.40%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

1.24

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

CNH’s Current Ratio of 1.24 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RTO

1.12

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

RTO’s Current Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the median group of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CNH vs. RTO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

3.55

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.55, CNH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

RTO

1.14

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

RTO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.14. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CNH vs. RTO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CNH

1.93

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.93 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

RTO

5.22

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

RTO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CNH vs. RTO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCNHRTO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.241.12
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.451.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.551.14
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.935.22

Growth

Revenue Growth

CNH vs. RTO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CNH vs. RTO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CNH

2.19%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

CNH’s Dividend Yield of 2.19% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RTO

3.44%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

RTO’s Dividend Yield of 3.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

CNH vs. RTO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CNH

40.58%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

CNH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.58% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RTO

93.97%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

RTO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 93.97% is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CNH vs. RTO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCNHRTO
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.19%3.44%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)40.58%93.97%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CNH

18.53

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

CNH’s P/E Ratio of 18.53 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RTO

27.30

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

RTO’s P/E Ratio of 27.30 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CNH vs. RTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CNH

0.84

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s P/S Ratio of 0.84 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

RTO

1.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

RTO’s P/S Ratio of 1.50 aligns with the market consensus for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CNH vs. RTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

2.10

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

CNH’s P/B Ratio of 2.10 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RTO

1.69

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

RTO’s P/B Ratio of 1.69 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CNH vs. RTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCNHRTO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.5327.30
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.841.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.101.69
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.8213.32