Seek Returns logo

CNH vs. ROK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CNH and ROK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCNHROK
Company NameCNH Industrial N.V.Rockwell Automation, Inc.
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization16.05 billion USD39.24 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 30, 2013December 31, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CNH and ROK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CNH vs. ROK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCNHROK
5-Day Price Return3.13%4.94%
13-Week Price Return-3.53%16.42%
26-Week Price Return5.34%29.88%
52-Week Price Return35.77%37.94%
Month-to-Date Return-1.00%-0.77%
Year-to-Date Return13.24%22.12%
10-Day Avg. Volume12.88M1.32M
3-Month Avg. Volume18.37M1.00M
3-Month Volatility28.28%21.53%
Beta1.551.42

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CNH

10.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

CNH’s Return on Equity of 10.67% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ROK

28.15%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, ROK’s Return on Equity of 28.15% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CNH vs. ROK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CNH

4.55%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s Net Profit Margin of 4.55% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ROK

12.03%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.03% places ROK in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CNH vs. ROK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CNH

17.85%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.85% places CNH in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ROK

13.99%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

ROK’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.99% is around the midpoint for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CNH vs. ROK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCNHROK
Return on Equity (TTM)10.67%28.15%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.91%8.75%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.55%12.03%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.85%13.99%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)32.40%39.43%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

1.24

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

CNH’s Current Ratio of 1.24 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ROK

1.06

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

ROK’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CNH vs. ROK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

3.55

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.55, CNH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ROK

1.00

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

ROK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electrical Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.00. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CNH vs. ROK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CNH

1.93

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.93 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ROK

--

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ROK is currently unavailable.

CNH vs. ROK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCNHROK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.241.06
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.450.72
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.551.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.93--

Growth

Revenue Growth

CNH vs. ROK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CNH vs. ROK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CNH

2.08%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

CNH’s Dividend Yield of 2.08% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ROK

1.50%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ROK’s Dividend Yield of 1.50% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CNH vs. ROK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CNH

40.58%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

CNH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.58% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ROK

60.38%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ROK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 60.38% is in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CNH vs. ROK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCNHROK
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.08%1.50%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)40.58%60.38%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CNH

19.51

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

CNH’s P/E Ratio of 19.51 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ROK

40.14

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

ROK’s P/E Ratio of 40.14 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CNH vs. ROK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CNH

0.89

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s P/S Ratio of 0.89 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ROK

4.83

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

ROK’s P/S Ratio of 4.83 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CNH vs. ROK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

2.10

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

CNH’s P/B Ratio of 2.10 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ROK

10.81

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

At 10.81, ROK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CNH vs. ROK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCNHROK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.5140.14
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.894.83
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.1010.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.1829.49