CNH vs. PAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 21, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CNH and PAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CNH is a standard domestic listing, while PAC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	CNH	PAC
Company Name	CNH Industrial N.V.	Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
Country	United Kingdom	Mexico
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Machinery	Transportation Infrastructure
Market Capitalization	16.05 billion USD	12.57 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	September 30, 2013	February 27, 2006
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CNH and PAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CNH vs. PAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CNH	PAC
5-Day Price Return	3.13%	4.20%
13-Week Price Return	-3.53%	9.48%
26-Week Price Return	5.34%	19.16%
52-Week Price Return	35.77%	63.30%
Month-to-Date Return	-1.00%	7.25%
Year-to-Date Return	13.24%	26.81%
10-Day Avg. Volume	12.88M	0.43M
3-Month Avg. Volume	18.37M	0.73M
3-Month Volatility	28.28%	25.94%
Beta	1.55	1.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CNH

10.67%

Machinery Industry

Max: 34.68%
Q3: 19.06%
Median: 13.13%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -4.87%

CNH’s Return on Equity of 10.67% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PAC

42.80%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 26.85%
Q3: 15.47%
Median: 10.39%
Q1: 7.70%
Min: 0.79%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 42.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CNH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CNH

4.55%

Machinery Industry

Max: 19.74%
Q3: 11.24%
Median: 8.13%
Q1: 5.38%
Min: -1.11%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s Net Profit Margin of 4.55% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

PAC

23.19%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 49.26%
Q3: 27.75%
Median: 17.98%
Q1: 10.18%
Min: 4.19%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 23.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CNH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CNH

17.85%

Machinery Industry

Max: 26.63%
Q3: 16.15%
Median: 11.27%
Q1: 7.72%
Min: -4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.85% places CNH in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PAC

42.29%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 60.91%
Q3: 43.57%
Median: 30.58%
Q1: 16.77%
Min: 1.18%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.29% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CNH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CNH	PAC
Return on Equity (TTM)	10.67%	42.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)	1.91%	11.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	4.55%	23.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	17.85%	42.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	32.40%	100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

1.24

Machinery Industry

Max: 3.83
Q3: 2.32
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.28
Min: 0.78

CNH’s Current Ratio of 1.24 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PAC

0.93

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 3.35
Q3: 1.90
Median: 1.35
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.28

PAC’s Current Ratio of 0.93 aligns with the median group of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CNH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

3.55

Machinery Industry

Max: 1.49
Q3: 0.75
Median: 0.44
Q1: 0.26
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.55, CNH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PAC

2.48

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 3.70
Q3: 1.70
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.48. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CNH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CNH

1.93

Machinery Industry

Max: 67.55
Q3: 33.79
Median: 13.87
Q1: 7.97
Min: -1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.93 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 29.26
Q3: 20.33
Median: 8.92
Q1: 5.22
Min: 2.01

In the lower quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CNH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CNH	PAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.24	0.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.45	0.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	3.55	2.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	1.93	5.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

CNH vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CNH vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CNH

2.08%

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.32%
Q3: 2.84%
Median: 1.87%
Q1: 1.09%
Min: 0.00%

CNH’s Dividend Yield of 2.08% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PAC

2.53%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 7.48%
Q3: 3.76%
Median: 2.40%
Q1: 1.13%
Min: 0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CNH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CNH

40.58%

Machinery Industry

Max: 202.17%
Q3: 98.65%
Median: 55.54%
Q1: 29.03%
Min: 0.00%

CNH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.58% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PAC

71.16%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 197.82%
Q3: 109.11%
Median: 70.69%
Q1: 33.40%
Min: 0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.16% is within the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CNH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CNH	PAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.08%	2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	40.58%	71.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CNH

19.51

Machinery Industry

Max: 53.66
Q3: 31.29
Median: 22.00
Q1: 16.18
Min: 7.00

CNH’s P/E Ratio of 19.51 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PAC

19.76

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 35.90
Q3: 21.76
Median: 17.41
Q1: 12.31
Min: 5.46

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 19.76 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CNH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CNH

0.89

Machinery Industry

Max: 5.04
Q3: 2.72
Median: 1.67
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.24

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s P/S Ratio of 0.89 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

PAC

4.58

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 10.76
Q3: 5.52
Median: 2.96
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.84

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.58 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CNH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

2.10

Machinery Industry

Max: 7.23
Q3: 3.90
Median: 2.52
Q1: 1.47
Min: 0.49

CNH’s P/B Ratio of 2.10 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PAC

9.90

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 4.46
Q3: 2.80
Median: 1.80
Q1: 1.12
Min: 0.37

At 9.90, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CNH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CNH	PAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	19.51	19.76
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.89	4.58
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	2.10	9.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	7.18	18.23