Seek Returns logo

CNH vs. LMT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CNH and LMT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCNHLMT
Company NameCNH Industrial N.V.Lockheed Martin Corporation
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization12.33 billion USD109.35 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 30, 2013January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CNH and LMT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CNH vs. LMT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCNHLMT
5-Day Price Return4.36%3.02%
13-Week Price Return-17.56%6.45%
26-Week Price Return-24.83%1.29%
52-Week Price Return0.00%-16.49%
Month-to-Date Return-4.19%-5.31%
Year-to-Date Return-11.30%-4.15%
10-Day Avg. Volume15.48M1.32M
3-Month Avg. Volume13.31M1.56M
3-Month Volatility27.58%16.93%
Beta1.290.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CNH

7.72%

Machinery Industry

Max
30.85%
Q3
19.99%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.44%
Min
-7.69%

CNH’s Return on Equity of 7.72% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

LMT

68.48%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
23.64%
Median
12.98%
Q1
8.07%
Min
-2.55%

LMT’s Return on Equity of 68.48% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CNH vs. LMT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CNH

3.35%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.28%
Q3
10.99%
Median
7.89%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-1.46%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s Net Profit Margin of 3.35% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

LMT

5.73%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.96%
Q3
9.50%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.45%
Min
1.01%

LMT’s Net Profit Margin of 5.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CNH vs. LMT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CNH

16.46%

Machinery Industry

Max
27.20%
Q3
15.91%
Median
11.33%
Q1
7.73%
Min
0.23%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.46% places CNH in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LMT

8.31%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
17.97%
Q3
12.09%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.41%
Min
-1.59%

LMT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.31% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CNH vs. LMT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCNHLMT
Return on Equity (TTM)7.72%68.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.39%7.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.35%5.73%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.46%8.31%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)32.19%8.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

1.69

Machinery Industry

Max
3.27
Q3
2.16
Median
1.75
Q1
1.32
Min
0.70

CNH’s Current Ratio of 1.69 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LMT

1.13

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
2.01
Median
1.22
Q1
1.07
Min
0.68

LMT’s Current Ratio of 1.13 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CNH vs. LMT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

3.51

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.45
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.51, CNH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LMT

3.59

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.99
Median
0.63
Q1
0.39
Min
0.03

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.59, LMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CNH vs. LMT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CNH

1.93

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
36.46
Median
13.55
Q1
7.73
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.93 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LMT

7.49

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
29.86
Q3
19.49
Median
7.09
Q1
2.62
Min
-7.63

LMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CNH vs. LMT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCNHLMT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.691.13
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.580.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.513.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.937.49

Growth

Revenue Growth

CNH vs. LMT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CNH vs. LMT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CNH

2.69%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.98%
Q3
2.83%
Median
1.89%
Q1
1.17%
Min
0.00%

CNH’s Dividend Yield of 2.69% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LMT

2.87%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.87%
Q3
1.46%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.10%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.87%, LMT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CNH vs. LMT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CNH

55.11%

Machinery Industry

Max
209.29%
Q3
102.41%
Median
62.34%
Q1
29.36%
Min
0.00%

CNH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 55.11% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LMT

74.05%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
51.46%
Median
20.20%
Q1
4.21%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 74.05% is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CNH vs. LMT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCNHLMT
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.69%2.87%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)55.11%74.05%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CNH

20.46

Machinery Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
29.52
Median
24.18
Q1
16.92
Min
7.99

CNH’s P/E Ratio of 20.46 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LMT

25.77

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
94.22
Q3
53.31
Median
32.27
Q1
24.64
Min
14.57

LMT’s P/E Ratio of 25.77 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CNH vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CNH

0.69

Machinery Industry

Max
5.25
Q3
2.82
Median
1.74
Q1
0.99
Min
0.27

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s P/S Ratio of 0.69 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LMT

1.48

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
7.20
Q3
3.95
Median
2.35
Q1
1.71
Min
0.32

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, LMT’s P/S Ratio of 1.48 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CNH vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

1.76

Machinery Industry

Max
7.18
Q3
4.18
Median
2.71
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

CNH’s P/B Ratio of 1.76 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LMT

18.58

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
18.61
Q3
9.58
Median
5.45
Q1
3.11
Min
0.94

LMT’s P/B Ratio of 18.58 is in the upper tier for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CNH vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCNHLMT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.4625.77
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.691.48
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.7618.58
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)5.7522.82