CNH vs. FER: CNH Industrial vs. Ferrovial Stock Comparison
How do CNH Industrial (CNH) and Ferrovial (FER) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
CNH Industrial (CNH) and Ferrovial (FER) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CNH is classified in Machinery while FER is classified in Construction & Engineering.
| Profile Item | CNH | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Name | CNH Industrial N.V. | Ferrovial N.V. |
| Country/Region | United Kingdom | Netherlands |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Construction & Engineering |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Agricultural & Farm Machinery | Construction & Engineering |
| Market Capitalization | 18.59 billion USD | 42.19 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | September 30, 2013 | August 13, 2012 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CNH | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 38.02% | -1.10% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 11.70% | 26.01% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -0.45% | 17.20% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CNH | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 45.52% | 27.38% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.19 | 0.36 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -43.80% | -33.67% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 18.71M | 1.95M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CNH | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.74 | -0.20 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.25 | -0.30 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Ferrovial (FER) at 11.62% is around its peer norm for ROE, while CNH Industrial (CNH) at 3.91% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
3.91%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- CNH
- 3.91%
- Min
- -17.12%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
11.62%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- FER
- 11.62%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both CNH Industrial (CNH) at 1.71% and Ferrovial (FER) at 6.15% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
1.71%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- CNH
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
6.15%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- FER
- 6.15%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both CNH Industrial (CNH) at 5.54% and Ferrovial (FER) at 10.45% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
5.54%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- CNH
- 5.54%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
10.45%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- FER
- 10.45%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CNH | FER |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 3.91% | 11.62% |
| ROA (TTM) | 0.87% | 2.62% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 1.71% | 6.15% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 5.54% | 10.45% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 17.76% | 87.14% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Ferrovial (FER) at 5.24% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while CNH Industrial (CNH) at -8.78% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both CNH Industrial (CNH) at -58.59% and Ferrovial (FER) at -72.26% post bottom-quartile EPS growth versus peers, pointing to weaker earnings momentum than typical rivals.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CNH | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.78% | 5.24% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -8.41% | 8.43% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -58.59% | -72.26% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -34.96% | 70.54% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
CNH Industrial (CNH) at 4.88 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Ferrovial (FER) at 1.20 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
4.88
- Max
- 5.22
- CNH
- 4.88
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
FER
Capital Goods industry group
1.20
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- FER
- 1.20
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both balance sheets lean debt-heavy versus peers, but CNH is more stretched: Ferrovial (FER) at 1.44 sits in the higher-leverage quartile and CNH Industrial (CNH) at 3.35 is above its industry benchmark range.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
3.35
- CNH
- 3.35
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
FER
Capital Goods industry group
1.44
- Max
- 2.33
- FER
- 1.44
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CNH | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 4.88 | 1.20 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 3.35 | 1.44 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 23.62 | 4.39 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both CNH Industrial (CNH) at 0.89% and Ferrovial (FER) at 0.94% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
0.89%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- CNH
- 0.89%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
0.94%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- FER
- 0.94%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both pay out more than their industries’ typical bands, and FER more so: CNH Industrial (CNH) at 40.00% sits above the band, while Ferrovial (FER) at 71.24% exceeds every peer in its group.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
40.00%
- Max
- 67.39%
- CNH
- 40.00%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
71.24%
- FER
- 71.24%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CNH | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.89% | 0.94% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 40.00% | 71.24% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Ferrovial (FER) at 32.26 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while CNH Industrial (CNH) at 46.24 sits in the richer quartile — CNH needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
46.24
- Max
- 59.38
- CNH
- 46.24
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
FER
Capital Goods industry group
32.26
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- FER
- 32.26
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
CNH Industrial (CNH) at 1.02 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at 4.28 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
1.02
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- CNH
- 1.02
- Min
- 0.03
FER
Capital Goods industry group
4.28
- Max
- 7.54
- FER
- 4.28
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
CNH Industrial (CNH) at 1.84 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Ferrovial (FER) at 6.59 carries an above-peer premium to book — FER is pricier on assets.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
1.84
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- CNH
- 1.84
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
FER
Capital Goods industry group
6.59
- Max
- 9.66
- FER
- 6.59
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CNH | FER |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 46.24 | 32.26 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.02 | 4.28 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.84 | 6.59 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.03% | 2.11% |