Seek Returns logo

CNH vs. ERJ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CNH and ERJ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CNH is a standard domestic listing, while ERJ trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCNHERJ
Company NameCNH Industrial N.V.Embraer S.A.
CountryUnited KingdomBrazil
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization13.71 billion USD10.76 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 30, 2013July 21, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CNH and ERJ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CNH vs. ERJ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCNHERJ
5-Day Price Return1.01%-2.95%
13-Week Price Return-18.63%-6.15%
26-Week Price Return-12.04%16.67%
52-Week Price Return0.74%62.74%
Month-to-Date Return1.01%-4.47%
Year-to-Date Return-3.27%36.50%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.17M4.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume16.15M6.10M
3-Month Volatility26.49%40.08%
Beta1.330.47

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CNH

10.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

CNH’s Return on Equity of 10.67% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ERJ

11.78%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
37.11%
Q3
20.14%
Median
11.72%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-6.24%

ERJ’s Return on Equity of 11.78% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CNH vs. ERJ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CNH

4.55%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s Net Profit Margin of 4.55% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ERJ

5.37%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.66%
Q3
8.61%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.92%
Min
1.01%

ERJ’s Net Profit Margin of 5.37% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CNH vs. ERJ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CNH

17.85%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.85% places CNH in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ERJ

11.14%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.83%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-2.15%

ERJ’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.14% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CNH vs. ERJ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCNHERJ
Return on Equity (TTM)10.67%11.78%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.91%3.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.55%5.37%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.85%11.14%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)32.40%18.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

1.24

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

CNH’s Current Ratio of 1.24 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ERJ

1.33

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
2.03
Median
1.24
Q1
1.04
Min
0.77

ERJ’s Current Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CNH vs. ERJ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

3.55

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.55, CNH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ERJ

0.70

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
0.96
Median
0.63
Q1
0.37
Min
0.03

ERJ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.70 is typical for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CNH vs. ERJ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CNH

1.93

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.93 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ERJ

36.57

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.08
Median
7.25
Q1
2.65
Min
-7.63

ERJ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.57 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CNH vs. ERJ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCNHERJ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.241.33
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.450.59
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.550.70
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.9336.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

CNH vs. ERJ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CNH vs. ERJ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CNH

2.45%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

CNH’s Dividend Yield of 2.45% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ERJ

0.09%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.72%
Q3
1.45%
Median
0.48%
Q1
0.08%
Min
0.00%

ERJ’s Dividend Yield of 0.09% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CNH vs. ERJ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CNH

40.58%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

CNH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.58% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ERJ

11.51%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
50.43%
Median
17.11%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

ERJ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.51% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CNH vs. ERJ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCNHERJ
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.45%0.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)40.58%11.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CNH

16.55

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s P/E Ratio of 16.55 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ERJ

26.35

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
67.20
Q3
55.74
Median
33.28
Q1
27.49
Min
15.02

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, ERJ’s P/E Ratio of 26.35 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CNH vs. ERJ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CNH

0.75

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s P/S Ratio of 0.75 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ERJ

1.42

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
4.87
Median
2.47
Q1
1.61
Min
0.33

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, ERJ’s P/S Ratio of 1.42 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CNH vs. ERJ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

2.10

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

CNH’s P/B Ratio of 2.10 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ERJ

3.13

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.90
Q3
8.93
Median
4.70
Q1
3.03
Min
0.83

ERJ’s P/B Ratio of 3.13 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CNH vs. ERJ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCNHERJ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.5526.35
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.751.42
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.103.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.099.62