Seek Returns logo

CNA vs. EQH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CNA and EQH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCNAEQH
Company NameCNA Financial CorporationEquitable Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryInsuranceFinancial Services
Market Capitalization12.49 billion USD13.14 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973May 10, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CNA and EQH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CNA vs. EQH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCNAEQH
5-Day Price Return2.14%0.25%
13-Week Price Return-2.98%-17.03%
26-Week Price Return-4.52%-17.58%
52-Week Price Return-4.10%-6.68%
Month-to-Date Return3.95%-9.47%
Year-to-Date Return-4.26%-5.19%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.37M3.32M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.46M2.86M
3-Month Volatility16.91%27.01%
Beta0.391.16

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CNA

9.32%

Insurance Industry

Max
31.64%
Q3
19.22%
Median
14.77%
Q1
10.48%
Min
2.20%

CNA’s Return on Equity of 9.32% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

EQH

-52.70%

Financial Services Industry

Max
34.42%
Q3
16.76%
Median
9.18%
Q1
3.90%
Min
-10.16%

EQH has a negative Return on Equity of -52.70%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CNA vs. EQH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CNA

6.71%

Insurance Industry

Max
28.47%
Q3
15.63%
Median
10.40%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-3.51%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance industry, CNA’s Net Profit Margin of 6.71% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

EQH

-4.62%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.33%
Median
13.11%
Q1
7.04%
Min
-8.99%

EQH has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.62%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CNA vs. EQH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CNA

9.39%

Insurance Industry

Max
35.59%
Q3
21.31%
Median
14.99%
Q1
10.34%
Min
-2.51%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

EQH

12.18%

Financial Services Industry

Max
81.07%
Q3
40.32%
Median
19.93%
Q1
10.20%
Min
-34.40%

EQH’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.18% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CNA vs. EQH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCNAEQH
Return on Equity (TTM)9.32%-52.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.46%-0.23%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.71%-4.62%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.39%12.18%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--49.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CNA

2.64

Insurance Industry

Max
2.64
Q3
1.19
Median
0.53
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

EQH

3.08

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.26
Median
1.33
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CNA vs. EQH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CNA

0.31

Insurance Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.65
Median
0.35
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

EQH

135.93

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.55
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CNA vs. EQH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CNA

10.11

Insurance Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
22.05
Median
9.63
Q1
3.42
Min
-5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

EQH

1.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
140.54
Q3
57.67
Median
6.72
Q1
1.93
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CNA vs. EQH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCNAEQH
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.643.08
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.863.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.31135.93
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)10.111.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

CNA vs. EQH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CNA vs. EQH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CNA

8.33%

Insurance Industry

Max
9.43%
Q3
5.10%
Median
3.57%
Q1
2.02%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 8.33%, CNA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Insurance industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

EQH

3.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.52%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.75%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Yield of 3.09% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CNA vs. EQH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CNA

104.41%

Insurance Industry

Max
169.40%
Q3
85.57%
Median
50.55%
Q1
22.12%
Min
0.00%

CNA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 104.41% is in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

EQH

21.08%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
17.51%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.08% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CNA vs. EQH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCNAEQH
Dividend Yield (TTM)8.33%3.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)104.41%21.08%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CNA

12.54

Insurance Industry

Max
27.66
Q3
17.29
Median
12.59
Q1
9.86
Min
3.13

CNA’s P/E Ratio of 12.54 is within the middle range for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EQH

--

Financial Services Industry

Max
46.13
Q3
28.79
Median
13.18
Q1
9.14
Min
0.47

P/E Ratio data for EQH is currently unavailable.

CNA vs. EQH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CNA

0.84

Insurance Industry

Max
3.39
Q3
1.95
Median
1.25
Q1
0.83
Min
0.22

CNA’s P/S Ratio of 0.84 aligns with the market consensus for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EQH

0.83

Financial Services Industry

Max
9.71
Q3
4.81
Median
2.49
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CNA vs. EQH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CNA

1.11

Insurance Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.47
Median
1.77
Q1
1.18
Min
0.17

CNA’s P/B Ratio of 1.11 is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

EQH

102.77

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.21
Q3
3.51
Median
1.52
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

At 102.77, EQH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CNA vs. EQH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCNAEQH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.54--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.840.83
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.11102.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)4.9510.49