Seek Returns logo

CMS vs. VST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CMS and VST, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCMSVST
Company NameCMS Energy CorporationVistra Corp.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryMulti-UtilitiesIndependent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers
Market Capitalization21.66 billion USD70.21 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973October 5, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CMS and VST by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CMS vs. VST: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCMSVST
5-Day Price Return1.96%-3.04%
13-Week Price Return3.19%1.09%
26-Week Price Return-1.07%57.99%
52-Week Price Return2.46%66.43%
Month-to-Date Return-1.21%3.60%
Year-to-Date Return8.58%42.10%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.72M5.30M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.30M4.89M
3-Month Volatility14.51%42.81%
Beta0.481.32

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CMS

12.37%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
20.00%
Q3
13.79%
Median
9.45%
Q1
7.88%
Min
4.56%

CMS’s Return on Equity of 12.37% is on par with the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VST

46.24%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
25.91%
Q3
13.69%
Median
7.86%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-6.69%

VST’s Return on Equity of 46.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CMS vs. VST: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CMS

13.35%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
23.49%
Q3
14.79%
Median
9.24%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-1.05%

CMS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VST

14.92%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
23.58%
Q3
14.30%
Median
8.59%
Q1
5.08%
Min
-2.06%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.92% places VST in the upper quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CMS vs. VST: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CMS

22.35%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
45.01%
Q3
26.69%
Median
19.18%
Q1
7.66%
Min
-0.18%

CMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.35% is around the midpoint for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VST

22.38%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
31.45%
Q3
22.28%
Median
16.08%
Q1
11.37%
Min
4.97%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.38% places VST in the upper quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CMS vs. VST: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCMSVST
Return on Equity (TTM)12.37%46.24%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.83%6.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.35%14.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.35%22.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.86%8.71%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

1.00

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
1.10
Median
0.95
Q1
0.82
Min
0.48

CMS’s Current Ratio of 1.00 aligns with the median group of the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VST

0.90

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
1.25
Median
0.81
Q1
0.66
Min
0.27

VST’s Current Ratio of 0.90 aligns with the median group of the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CMS vs. VST: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

2.15

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
3.03
Q3
2.00
Median
1.55
Q1
1.24
Min
0.58

CMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Multi-Utilities industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.15. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VST

4.00

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
4.71
Q3
2.80
Median
1.91
Q1
1.17
Min
0.18

VST’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.00. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CMS vs. VST: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CMS

2.73

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
9.98
Q3
5.96
Median
3.48
Q1
2.74
Min
0.59

In the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry, CMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.73 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

VST

5.47

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
10.03
Q3
7.41
Median
2.59
Q1
1.32
Min
-1.62

VST’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.47 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CMS vs. VST: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCMSVST
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.000.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.730.73
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.154.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.735.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

CMS vs. VST: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CMS vs. VST: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CMS

3.34%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
10.02%
Q3
5.84%
Median
4.22%
Q1
2.96%
Min
0.00%

CMS’s Dividend Yield of 3.34% is consistent with its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VST

0.74%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
5.56%
Median
3.97%
Q1
2.26%
Min
0.00%

VST’s Dividend Yield of 0.74% is in the lower quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CMS vs. VST: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CMS

71.26%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
161.38%
Q3
101.19%
Median
73.21%
Q1
58.41%
Min
31.93%

CMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.26% is within the typical range for the Multi-Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VST

14.95%

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
113.12%
Q3
82.87%
Median
49.83%
Q1
22.46%
Min
0.00%

VST’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.95% is in the lower quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CMS vs. VST: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCMSVST
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.34%0.74%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)71.26%14.95%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CMS

21.35

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
27.93
Q3
20.57
Median
15.98
Q1
9.34
Min
5.25

A P/E Ratio of 21.35 places CMS in the upper quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

VST

28.53

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
43.87
Q3
23.80
Median
10.75
Q1
8.70
Min
4.34

A P/E Ratio of 28.53 places VST in the upper quartile for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CMS vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CMS

2.85

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
5.00
Q3
3.46
Median
1.80
Q1
0.46
Min
0.26

CMS’s P/S Ratio of 2.85 aligns with the market consensus for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VST

4.26

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
7.59
Q3
3.75
Median
2.31
Q1
0.81
Min
0.42

VST’s P/S Ratio of 4.26 is in the upper echelon for the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CMS vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

2.47

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
2.52
Q3
2.12
Median
1.55
Q1
1.25
Min
0.91

CMS’s P/B Ratio of 2.47 is in the upper tier for the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

VST

13.64

Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers Industry

Max
3.43
Q3
2.06
Median
1.40
Q1
0.88
Min
0.33

At 13.64, VST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CMS vs. VST: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Independent Power and Renewable Electricity Producers industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCMSVST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.3528.53
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.854.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.4713.64
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)158.2644.15