Seek Returns logo

CMS vs. SMR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CMS and SMR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCMSSMR
Company NameCMS Energy CorporationNuScale Power Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorUtilitiesIndustrials
GICS IndustryMulti-UtilitiesElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization21.66 billion USD5.17 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973March 1, 2022
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CMS and SMR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CMS vs. SMR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCMSSMR
5-Day Price Return1.96%-9.25%
13-Week Price Return3.19%-9.00%
26-Week Price Return-1.07%110.28%
52-Week Price Return2.46%186.85%
Month-to-Date Return-1.21%3.90%
Year-to-Date Return8.58%100.78%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.72M22.53M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.30M15.59M
3-Month Volatility14.51%93.02%
Beta0.482.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CMS

12.37%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
20.00%
Q3
13.79%
Median
9.45%
Q1
7.88%
Min
4.56%

CMS’s Return on Equity of 12.37% is on par with the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SMR

-22.81%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.67%
Q3
23.64%
Median
11.74%
Q1
6.08%
Min
-4.39%

SMR has a negative Return on Equity of -22.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CMS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CMS

13.35%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
23.49%
Q3
14.79%
Median
9.24%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-1.05%

CMS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SMR

-221.07%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.60%
Q3
10.26%
Median
5.83%
Q1
2.92%
Min
-0.75%

SMR has a negative Net Profit Margin of -221.07%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CMS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CMS

22.35%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
45.01%
Q3
26.69%
Median
19.18%
Q1
7.66%
Min
-0.18%

CMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.35% is around the midpoint for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SMR

-233.90%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.24%
Q3
14.53%
Median
7.97%
Q1
3.45%
Min
-5.64%

SMR has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -233.90%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CMS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCMSSMR
Return on Equity (TTM)12.37%-22.81%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.83%-24.54%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.35%-221.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.35%-233.90%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.86%71.50%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

1.00

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
1.10
Median
0.95
Q1
0.82
Min
0.48

CMS’s Current Ratio of 1.00 aligns with the median group of the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SMR

4.22

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.09
Median
1.48
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

SMR’s Current Ratio of 4.22 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CMS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

2.15

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
3.03
Q3
2.00
Median
1.55
Q1
1.24
Min
0.58

CMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Multi-Utilities industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.15. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SMR

0.00

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.96
Median
0.57
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, SMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CMS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CMS

2.73

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
9.98
Q3
5.96
Median
3.48
Q1
2.74
Min
0.59

In the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry, CMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.73 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SMR

-58.59

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
44.15
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
0.98
Min
-19.47

SMR has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -58.59. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CMS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCMSSMR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.004.22
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.734.18
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.150.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.73-58.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

CMS vs. SMR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CMS vs. SMR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CMS

3.34%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
10.02%
Q3
5.84%
Median
4.22%
Q1
2.96%
Min
0.00%

CMS’s Dividend Yield of 3.34% is consistent with its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SMR

0.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.04%
Q3
1.58%
Median
1.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SMR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CMS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CMS

71.26%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
161.38%
Q3
101.19%
Median
73.21%
Q1
58.41%
Min
31.93%

CMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.26% is within the typical range for the Multi-Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SMR

0.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
165.68%
Q3
71.84%
Median
38.15%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SMR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CMS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCMSSMR
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.34%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)71.26%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CMS

21.35

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
27.93
Q3
20.57
Median
15.98
Q1
9.34
Min
5.25

A P/E Ratio of 21.35 places CMS in the upper quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SMR

--

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
65.02
Q3
38.99
Median
27.41
Q1
19.88
Min
8.37

P/E Ratio data for SMR is currently unavailable.

CMS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CMS

2.85

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
5.00
Q3
3.46
Median
1.80
Q1
0.46
Min
0.26

CMS’s P/S Ratio of 2.85 aligns with the market consensus for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SMR

185.81

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.01
Q3
4.03
Median
1.79
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

With a P/S Ratio of 185.81, SMR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electrical Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CMS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

2.47

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
2.52
Q3
2.12
Median
1.55
Q1
1.25
Min
0.91

CMS’s P/B Ratio of 2.47 is in the upper tier for the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SMR

16.24

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.97
Q3
5.57
Median
3.50
Q1
1.66
Min
0.64

At 16.24, SMR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CMS vs. SMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCMSSMR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.35--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.85185.81
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.4716.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)158.26--