Seek Returns logo

CMS vs. NRG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CMS and NRG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCMSNRG
Company NameCMS Energy CorporationNRG Energy, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryMulti-UtilitiesElectric Utilities
Market Capitalization22.57 billion USD32.32 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973December 2, 2003
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CMS and NRG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CMS vs. NRG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCMSNRG
5-Day Price Return-0.51%-0.92%
13-Week Price Return3.37%11.15%
26-Week Price Return8.24%5.41%
52-Week Price Return10.46%78.62%
Month-to-Date Return1.24%-3.88%
Year-to-Date Return11.72%83.10%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.74M2.34M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.34M2.50M
3-Month Volatility13.96%36.75%
Beta0.481.25

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CMS

12.38%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
20.00%
Q3
13.72%
Median
9.49%
Q1
7.74%
Min
-0.57%

CMS’s Return on Equity of 12.38% is on par with the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NRG

60.59%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
23.26%
Q3
15.09%
Median
10.59%
Q1
6.99%
Min
-0.30%

NRG’s Return on Equity of 60.59% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electric Utilities industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CMS vs. NRG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CMS

13.23%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
22.58%
Q3
14.93%
Median
9.68%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-1.14%

CMS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.23% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NRG

4.84%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
31.47%
Q3
17.33%
Median
11.03%
Q1
7.47%
Min
-3.66%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, NRG’s Net Profit Margin of 4.84% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CMS vs. NRG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CMS

23.08%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
45.31%
Q3
26.29%
Median
19.25%
Q1
7.66%
Min
-0.18%

CMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.08% is around the midpoint for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NRG

7.94%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
44.32%
Q3
25.44%
Median
18.95%
Q1
12.27%
Min
0.08%

NRG’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.94% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CMS vs. NRG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCMSNRG
Return on Equity (TTM)12.38%60.59%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.83%5.94%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.23%4.84%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.08%7.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.86%18.40%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

0.90

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
1.23
Q3
1.11
Median
0.93
Q1
0.87
Min
0.51

CMS’s Current Ratio of 0.90 aligns with the median group of the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NRG

1.05

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
1.15
Median
0.97
Q1
0.77
Min
0.30

NRG’s Current Ratio of 1.05 aligns with the median group of the Electric Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CMS vs. NRG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

2.04

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
3.16
Q3
2.03
Median
1.56
Q1
1.21
Min
0.58

CMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Multi-Utilities industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.04. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

NRG

6.06

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
3.47
Q3
1.87
Median
1.32
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 6.06, NRG operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electric Utilities industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CMS vs. NRG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CMS

2.73

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
9.98
Q3
5.96
Median
3.48
Q1
2.74
Min
0.59

In the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry, CMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.73 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

NRG

4.43

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
18.68
Q3
9.38
Median
3.32
Q1
2.57
Min
-3.31

NRG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.43 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CMS vs. NRG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCMSNRG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.901.05
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.570.87
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.046.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.734.43

Growth

Revenue Growth

CMS vs. NRG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CMS vs. NRG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CMS

2.89%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
6.29%
Q3
4.88%
Median
3.66%
Q1
2.95%
Min
1.67%

CMS’s Dividend Yield of 2.89% is in the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

NRG

1.29%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
6.61%
Q3
4.63%
Median
3.38%
Q1
2.30%
Min
0.00%

NRG’s Dividend Yield of 1.29% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CMS vs. NRG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CMS

62.27%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
110.63%
Q3
96.69%
Median
74.83%
Q1
57.12%
Min
31.93%

CMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 62.27% is within the typical range for the Multi-Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NRG

20.91%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
140.33%
Q3
85.57%
Median
63.88%
Q1
34.29%
Min
0.00%

NRG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.91% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CMS vs. NRG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCMSNRG
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.89%1.29%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)62.27%20.91%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CMS

21.54

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
29.37
Q3
20.20
Median
17.94
Q1
10.63
Min
5.90

A P/E Ratio of 21.54 places CMS in the upper quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

NRG

21.97

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
33.63
Q3
21.86
Median
17.07
Q1
10.96
Min
3.11

A P/E Ratio of 21.97 places NRG in the upper quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CMS vs. NRG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CMS

2.85

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
3.47
Median
2.06
Q1
0.49
Min
0.28

CMS’s P/S Ratio of 2.85 aligns with the market consensus for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NRG

1.06

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
6.73
Q3
3.36
Median
1.96
Q1
0.94
Min
0.01

NRG’s P/S Ratio of 1.06 aligns with the market consensus for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CMS vs. NRG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

2.47

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
2.71
Q3
2.22
Median
1.53
Q1
1.27
Min
0.88

CMS’s P/B Ratio of 2.47 is in the upper tier for the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

NRG

15.90

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
2.98
Q3
1.95
Median
1.51
Q1
1.04
Min
0.37

At 15.90, NRG’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electric Utilities industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CMS vs. NRG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCMSNRG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.5421.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.851.06
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.4715.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)163.4018.55