Seek Returns logo

CMS vs. GEV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CMS and GEV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCMSGEV
Company NameCMS Energy CorporationGE Vernova Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorUtilitiesIndustrials
GICS IndustryMulti-UtilitiesElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization21.99 billion USD172.67 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973March 27, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CMS and GEV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CMS vs. GEV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCMSGEV
5-Day Price Return-1.44%-1.79%
13-Week Price Return4.82%52.25%
26-Week Price Return7.51%69.23%
52-Week Price Return11.68%259.50%
Month-to-Date Return-0.46%-3.93%
Year-to-Date Return10.22%92.84%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.56M2.42M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.58M3.23M
3-Month Volatility17.48%41.81%
Beta0.411.55

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CMS

12.37%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
19.69%
Q3
12.97%
Median
9.30%
Q1
7.88%
Min
4.34%

CMS’s Return on Equity of 12.37% is on par with the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GEV

21.08%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, GEV’s Return on Equity of 21.08% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CMS vs. GEV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CMS

13.35%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
25.37%
Q3
15.24%
Median
8.50%
Q1
4.09%
Min
-1.05%

CMS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GEV

5.42%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

GEV’s Net Profit Margin of 5.42% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CMS vs. GEV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CMS

22.35%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
43.73%
Q3
25.91%
Median
19.49%
Q1
8.11%
Min
-0.18%

CMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.35% is around the midpoint for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GEV

5.53%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

GEV’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.53% is around the midpoint for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CMS vs. GEV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCMSGEV
Return on Equity (TTM)12.37%21.08%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.83%3.83%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.35%5.42%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.35%5.53%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.86%18.51%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

1.00

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.22
Median
0.94
Q1
0.86
Min
0.50

CMS’s Current Ratio of 1.00 aligns with the median group of the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GEV

1.04

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

GEV’s Current Ratio of 1.04 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CMS vs. GEV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

2.15

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
2.58
Q3
1.96
Median
1.56
Q1
1.20
Min
0.53

CMS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Multi-Utilities industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.15. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GEV

0.00

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, GEV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CMS vs. GEV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CMS

2.73

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
12.21
Q3
7.03
Median
3.61
Q1
2.92
Min
1.62

In the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry, CMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.73 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GEV

-0.05

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

GEV has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CMS vs. GEV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCMSGEV
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.001.04
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.730.76
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.150.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.73-0.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

CMS vs. GEV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CMS vs. GEV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CMS

3.32%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
8.75%
Q3
5.46%
Median
4.09%
Q1
2.93%
Min
0.00%

CMS’s Dividend Yield of 3.32% is consistent with its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GEV

0.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GEV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CMS vs. GEV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CMS

71.26%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
128.77%
Q3
97.17%
Median
66.46%
Q1
52.95%
Min
24.73%

CMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.26% is within the typical range for the Multi-Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GEV

0.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GEV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CMS vs. GEV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCMSGEV
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.32%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)71.26%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CMS

21.44

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
28.21
Q3
21.40
Median
16.89
Q1
11.54
Min
5.08

A P/E Ratio of 21.44 places CMS in the upper quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GEV

89.24

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

At 89.24, GEV’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CMS vs. GEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CMS

2.86

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
4.54
Q3
3.52
Median
1.87
Q1
0.50
Min
0.27

CMS’s P/S Ratio of 2.86 aligns with the market consensus for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GEV

4.84

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

GEV’s P/S Ratio of 4.84 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CMS vs. GEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CMS

2.47

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max
2.70
Q3
1.97
Median
1.46
Q1
1.21
Min
0.86

CMS’s P/B Ratio of 2.47 is in the upper tier for the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GEV

9.70

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

At 9.70, GEV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CMS vs. GEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCMSGEV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.4489.24
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.864.84
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.479.70
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)158.9250.67