CMS vs. ED: CMS Energy vs. Consolidated Edison Stock Comparison
How do CMS Energy (CMS) and Consolidated Edison (ED) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
CMS Energy (CMS) and Consolidated Edison (ED) are both classified in the Multi-Utilities sub-industry within the broader Multi-Utilities industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | CMS | ED |
|---|---|---|
| Name | CMS Energy Corporation Common Stock | Consolidated Edison Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Utilities | Utilities |
| GICS Industry Group | Utilities | Utilities |
| GICS Industry | Multi-Utilities | Multi-Utilities |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Multi-Utilities | Multi-Utilities |
| Market Capitalization | 21.70 billion USD | 44.00 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | January 2, 1962 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CMS | ED |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -1.93% | 24.62% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 11.79% | 13.82% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 6.25% | 12.66% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CMS | ED |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 17.58% | 17.94% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.31 | 0.23 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -28.04% | -22.03% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.84M | 2.21M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CMS | ED |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.35 | 1.13 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.49 | 1.74 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Consolidated Edison (ED) at 9.10% is around its peer norm for ROE, while CMS Energy (CMS) at 5.31% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.
CMS
Utilities industry group
5.31%
- Max
- 17.99%
- Q3
- 12.01%
- Median
- 9.44%
- Q1
- 7.56%
- CMS
- 5.31%
- Min
- 2.17%
ED
Utilities industry group
9.10%
- Max
- 17.99%
- Q3
- 12.01%
- Median
- 9.44%
- ED
- 9.10%
- Q1
- 7.56%
- Min
- 2.17%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both CMS Energy (CMS) at 9.72% and Consolidated Edison (ED) at 12.70% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CMS
Utilities industry group
9.72%
- Max
- 28.78%
- Q3
- 17.30%
- Median
- 12.73%
- CMS
- 9.72%
- Q1
- 9.18%
- Min
- -0.20%
ED
Utilities industry group
12.70%
- Max
- 28.78%
- Q3
- 17.30%
- Median
- 12.73%
- ED
- 12.70%
- Q1
- 9.18%
- Min
- -0.20%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both CMS Energy (CMS) at 28.45% and Consolidated Edison (ED) at 26.28% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CMS
Utilities industry group
28.45%
- Max
- 53.83%
- Q3
- 31.12%
- CMS
- 28.45%
- Median
- 23.62%
- Q1
- 15.45%
- Min
- -4.90%
ED
Utilities industry group
26.28%
- Max
- 53.83%
- Q3
- 31.12%
- ED
- 26.28%
- Median
- 23.62%
- Q1
- 15.45%
- Min
- -4.90%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CMS | ED |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 5.31% | 9.10% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.07% | 3.33% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 9.72% | 12.70% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 28.45% | 26.28% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 40.76% | 53.72% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
CMS Energy (CMS) at 13.63% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Consolidated Edison (ED) at 10.89% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for CMS.
EPS Growth
Both CMS Energy (CMS) at 4.19% and Consolidated Edison (ED) at 7.63% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CMS | ED |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 13.63% | 10.89% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.22% | 2.59% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 4.19% | 7.63% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.84% | 6.57% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
CMS Energy (CMS) at 0.95 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Consolidated Edison (ED) at 1.18 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
CMS
Utilities industry group
0.95
- Max
- 1.90
- Q3
- 1.17
- CMS
- 0.95
- Median
- 0.88
- Q1
- 0.66
- Min
- 0.29
ED
Utilities industry group
1.18
- Max
- 1.90
- ED
- 1.18
- Q3
- 1.17
- Median
- 0.88
- Q1
- 0.66
- Min
- 0.29
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Consolidated Edison (ED) at 1.06 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while CMS Energy (CMS) at 1.96 uses more debt funding than most peers.
CMS
Utilities industry group
1.96
- Max
- 2.63
- CMS
- 1.96
- Q3
- 1.77
- Median
- 1.35
- Q1
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.00
ED
Utilities industry group
1.06
- Max
- 2.63
- Q3
- 1.77
- Median
- 1.35
- ED
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CMS | ED |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.95 | 1.18 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.96 | 1.06 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.33 | 4.42 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both CMS Energy (CMS) at 3.21% and Consolidated Edison (ED) at 2.89% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CMS
Utilities industry group
3.21%
- Max
- 6.66%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- CMS
- 3.21%
- Median
- 2.85%
- Q1
- 0.66%
- Min
- 0.00%
ED
Utilities industry group
2.89%
- Max
- 6.66%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- ED
- 2.89%
- Median
- 2.85%
- Q1
- 0.66%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Consolidated Edison (ED) at 56.38% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while CMS Energy (CMS) at 80.45% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CMS
Utilities industry group
80.45%
- Max
- 113.04%
- CMS
- 80.45%
- Q3
- 68.72%
- Median
- 56.38%
- Q1
- 32.38%
- Min
- 0.00%
ED
Utilities industry group
56.38%
- Max
- 113.04%
- Q3
- 68.72%
- ED
- 56.38%
- Median
- 56.38%
- Q1
- 32.38%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CMS | ED |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.21% | 2.89% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 80.45% | 56.38% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Consolidated Edison (ED) at 19.03 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while CMS Energy (CMS) at 24.71 sits in the richer quartile — CMS needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
CMS
Utilities industry group
24.71
- Max
- 31.22
- CMS
- 24.71
- Q3
- 23.30
- Median
- 19.64
- Q1
- 15.17
- Min
- 3.34
ED
Utilities industry group
19.03
- Max
- 31.22
- Q3
- 23.30
- Median
- 19.64
- ED
- 19.03
- Q1
- 15.17
- Min
- 3.34
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both CMS Energy (CMS) at 2.42 and Consolidated Edison (ED) at 2.43 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CMS
Utilities industry group
2.42
- Max
- 6.35
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 2.63
- CMS
- 2.42
- Q1
- 1.52
- Min
- 0.00
ED
Utilities industry group
2.43
- Max
- 6.35
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 2.63
- ED
- 2.43
- Q1
- 1.52
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Consolidated Edison (ED) at 1.67 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while CMS Energy (CMS) at 2.28 carries an above-peer premium to book — CMS is pricier on assets.
CMS
Utilities industry group
2.28
- Max
- 3.12
- CMS
- 2.28
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.83
- Q1
- 1.46
- Min
- 0.34
ED
Utilities industry group
1.67
- Max
- 3.12
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.83
- ED
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.46
- Min
- 0.34
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CMS | ED |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 24.71 | 19.03 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.42 | 2.43 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.28 | 1.67 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -9.54% | -3.05% |