Seek Returns logo

CMG vs. SW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CMG and SW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCMGSW
Company NameChipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.Smurfit Westrock Plc
CountryUnited StatesIreland
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryMaterials
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization41.63 billion USD17.75 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 26, 2006June 17, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CMG and SW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CMG vs. SW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCMGSW
5-Day Price Return3.58%-3.41%
13-Week Price Return-28.32%-19.68%
26-Week Price Return-37.67%-25.42%
52-Week Price Return-46.74%-32.75%
Month-to-Date Return-0.38%-7.12%
Year-to-Date Return-47.65%-36.33%
10-Day Avg. Volume30.62M5.67M
3-Month Avg. Volume21.69M4.50M
3-Month Volatility44.17%38.68%
Beta0.991.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CMG

44.23%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
85.86%
Q3
39.97%
Median
16.82%
Q1
6.71%
Min
-33.94%

In the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, CMG’s Return on Equity of 44.23% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SW

5.12%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
33.32%
Q3
19.47%
Median
12.36%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-12.20%

SW’s Return on Equity of 5.12% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CMG vs. SW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CMG

13.04%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.51%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.65%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-9.83%

CMG’s Net Profit Margin of 13.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SW

2.06%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.45%
Q3
8.67%
Median
5.36%
Q1
3.40%
Min
-2.25%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Net Profit Margin of 2.06% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CMG vs. SW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CMG

16.38%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
41.93%
Q3
22.25%
Median
15.03%
Q1
6.66%
Min
-15.28%

CMG’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.38% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SW

5.23%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
12.87%
Median
9.18%
Q1
6.39%
Min
-0.41%

SW’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.23% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CMG vs. SW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCMGSW
Return on Equity (TTM)44.23%5.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.70%2.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.04%2.06%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.38%5.23%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.89%19.81%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CMG

1.54

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.86
Q3
1.63
Median
1.09
Q1
0.72
Min
0.16

CMG’s Current Ratio of 1.54 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SW

1.48

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.55
Median
1.33
Q1
1.14
Min
0.87

SW’s Current Ratio of 1.48 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CMG vs. SW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CMG

0.00

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
5.00
Median
1.69
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, CMG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SW

0.77

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
3.86
Q3
1.96
Median
1.25
Q1
0.67
Min
0.23

SW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CMG vs. SW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CMG

409.06

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
4.07
Q1
1.21
Min
-11.84

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 409.06, CMG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

SW

2.41

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CMG vs. SW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCMGSW
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.541.48
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.410.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)409.062.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

CMG vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CMG vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CMG

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.26%
Q3
2.86%
Median
1.03%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CMG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SW

4.71%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.42%
Q3
5.04%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Yield of 4.71% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CMG vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CMG

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
149.29%
Q3
62.26%
Median
24.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CMG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SW

63.96%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
63.96%
Q1
27.01%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.96% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CMG vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCMGSW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%4.71%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%63.96%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CMG

27.17

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
52.15
Q3
31.98
Median
20.63
Q1
14.77
Min
3.30

CMG’s P/E Ratio of 27.17 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SW

19.17

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
19.86
Q3
18.86
Median
16.72
Q1
13.58
Min
6.36

A P/E Ratio of 19.17 places SW in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CMG vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CMG

3.54

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.94
Q3
3.96
Median
2.01
Q1
1.22
Min
0.16

CMG’s P/S Ratio of 3.54 aligns with the market consensus for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SW

0.39

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.14
Median
0.89
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s P/S Ratio of 0.39 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CMG vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CMG

16.31

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
29.33
Q3
13.12
Median
4.61
Q1
2.02
Min
0.37

CMG’s P/B Ratio of 16.31 is in the upper tier for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SW

1.21

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.37
Q3
2.85
Median
2.17
Q1
1.46
Min
0.76

SW’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CMG vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCMGSW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.1719.17
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.540.39
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)16.311.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.5416.95