Seek Returns logo

CMG vs. PKG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CMG and PKG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCMGPKG
Company NameChipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.Packaging Corporation of America
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryMaterials
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization54.95 billion USD19.19 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 26, 2006January 28, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CMG and PKG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CMG vs. PKG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCMGPKG
5-Day Price Return1.76%-1.09%
13-Week Price Return-26.74%4.51%
26-Week Price Return-18.17%12.75%
52-Week Price Return-27.76%-0.03%
Month-to-Date Return4.57%-2.13%
Year-to-Date Return-32.04%-5.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume18.79M0.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume17.94M0.71M
3-Month Volatility35.24%22.53%
Beta1.020.94

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CMG

43.16%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

In the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, CMG’s Return on Equity of 43.16% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PKG

20.33%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
36.99%
Q3
19.86%
Median
10.47%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-0.20%

In the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, PKG’s Return on Equity of 20.33% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CMG vs. PKG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CMG

13.32%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

CMG’s Net Profit Margin of 13.32% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PKG

10.47%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
10.84%
Q3
8.25%
Median
4.91%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.12%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.47% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CMG vs. PKG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CMG

16.65%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

CMG’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.65% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PKG

14.39%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.09%
Median
8.06%
Q1
6.46%
Min
-0.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.39% places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CMG vs. PKG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCMGPKG
Return on Equity (TTM)43.16%20.33%
Return on Assets (TTM)16.88%10.16%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.32%10.47%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.65%14.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.11%22.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CMG

1.65

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

CMG’s Current Ratio of 1.65 is in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PKG

3.54

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.45
Median
1.33
Q1
1.09
Min
0.87

PKG’s Current Ratio of 3.54 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CMG vs. PKG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CMG

0.00

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, CMG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PKG

0.54

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.15
Q3
2.03
Median
1.20
Q1
0.53
Min
0.23

PKG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.54 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CMG vs. PKG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CMG

409.06

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 409.06, CMG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

PKG

26.71

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.38
Q1
2.83
Min
1.06

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 26.71, PKG demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CMG vs. PKG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCMGPKG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.653.54
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.532.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.54
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)409.0626.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

CMG vs. PKG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CMG vs. PKG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CMG

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CMG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PKG

2.37%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
4.65%
Median
3.69%
Q1
2.00%
Min
0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Yield of 2.37% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CMG vs. PKG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CMG

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CMG has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PKG

49.67%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
222.75%
Q3
132.16%
Median
65.79%
Q1
28.53%
Min
0.00%

PKG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 49.67% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CMG vs. PKG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCMGPKG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.37%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%49.67%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CMG

35.09

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

A P/E Ratio of 35.09 places CMG in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PKG

20.95

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
24.22
Q3
20.28
Median
17.07
Q1
15.06
Min
7.79

A P/E Ratio of 20.95 places PKG in the upper quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CMG vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CMG

4.67

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

CMG’s P/S Ratio of 4.67 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PKG

2.19

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
1.99
Q3
1.17
Median
0.94
Q1
0.55
Min
0.31

With a P/S Ratio of 2.19, PKG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Containers & Packaging industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CMG vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CMG

21.44

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

CMG’s P/B Ratio of 21.44 is in the upper tier for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PKG

3.66

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.79
Q3
3.32
Median
2.14
Q1
1.60
Min
0.89

PKG’s P/B Ratio of 3.66 is in the upper tier for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CMG vs. PKG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCMGPKG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)35.0920.95
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.672.19
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)21.443.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)36.9130.40