Seek Returns logo

CMCSA vs. LYV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CMCSA and LYV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCMCSALYV
Company NameComcast CorporationLive Nation Entertainment, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesCommunication Services
GICS IndustryMediaEntertainment
Market Capitalization125.57 billion USD38.47 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980December 21, 2005
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CMCSA and LYV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CMCSA vs. LYV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCMCSALYV
5-Day Price Return0.35%1.80%
13-Week Price Return-1.68%14.82%
26-Week Price Return-6.77%7.92%
52-Week Price Return-13.70%72.82%
Month-to-Date Return2.35%12.28%
Year-to-Date Return-9.38%28.06%
10-Day Avg. Volume20.54M2.06M
3-Month Avg. Volume21.41M2.45M
3-Month Volatility22.48%24.29%
Beta0.971.42

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CMCSA

25.82%

Media Industry

Max
34.77%
Q3
16.01%
Median
10.70%
Q1
2.80%
Min
-2.36%

In the upper quartile for the Media industry, CMCSA’s Return on Equity of 25.82% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LYV

396.60%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

LYV’s Return on Equity of 396.60% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CMCSA vs. LYV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CMCSA

18.44%

Media Industry

Max
16.04%
Q3
10.15%
Median
5.18%
Q1
2.39%
Min
-3.66%

CMCSA’s Net Profit Margin of 18.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Media industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

LYV

3.88%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, LYV’s Net Profit Margin of 3.88% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CMCSA vs. LYV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CMCSA

18.12%

Media Industry

Max
24.65%
Q3
13.68%
Median
8.96%
Q1
4.53%
Min
-8.09%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.12% places CMCSA in the upper quartile for the Media industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LYV

4.21%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

LYV’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.21% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CMCSA vs. LYV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCMCSALYV
Return on Equity (TTM)25.82%396.60%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.50%4.36%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.44%3.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.12%4.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)70.82%25.24%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CMCSA

0.91

Media Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.79
Median
1.39
Q1
0.92
Min
0.24

CMCSA’s Current Ratio of 0.91 falls into the lower quartile for the Media industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LYV

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

LYV’s Current Ratio of 0.88 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CMCSA vs. LYV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CMCSA

1.05

Media Industry

Max
2.02
Q3
1.06
Median
0.58
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

CMCSA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.05 is typical for the Media industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LYV

17.99

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 17.99, LYV operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Entertainment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CMCSA vs. LYV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CMCSA

4.64

Media Industry

Max
44.57
Q3
23.07
Median
4.52
Q1
2.14
Min
-10.82

CMCSA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Media industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LYV

4.97

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

LYV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CMCSA vs. LYV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCMCSALYV
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.910.88
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.910.74
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.0517.99
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.644.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

CMCSA vs. LYV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CMCSA vs. LYV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CMCSA

3.96%

Media Industry

Max
7.76%
Q3
4.16%
Median
1.67%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CMCSA’s Dividend Yield of 3.96% is consistent with its peers in the Media industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LYV

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LYV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CMCSA vs. LYV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CMCSA

21.21%

Media Industry

Max
165.03%
Q3
96.17%
Median
45.64%
Q1
14.80%
Min
0.00%

CMCSA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.21% is within the typical range for the Media industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LYV

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LYV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CMCSA vs. LYV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCMCSALYV
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.96%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)21.21%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CMCSA

5.36

Media Industry

Max
49.10
Q3
35.07
Median
17.34
Q1
10.39
Min
5.81

CMCSA’s P/E Ratio of 5.36 is below the typical range for the Media industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

LYV

41.09

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

LYV’s P/E Ratio of 41.09 is within the middle range for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CMCSA vs. LYV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CMCSA

0.99

Media Industry

Max
3.23
Q3
1.85
Median
1.05
Q1
0.78
Min
0.22

CMCSA’s P/S Ratio of 0.99 aligns with the market consensus for the Media industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LYV

1.59

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, LYV’s P/S Ratio of 1.59 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CMCSA vs. LYV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CMCSA

1.38

Media Industry

Max
4.30
Q3
2.57
Median
1.83
Q1
1.19
Min
0.51

CMCSA’s P/B Ratio of 1.38 is within the conventional range for the Media industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LYV

97.21

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

At 97.21, LYV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CMCSA vs. LYV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Media and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCMCSALYV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)5.3641.09
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.991.59
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.3897.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.4016.88