Seek Returns logo

CLX vs. SJM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLX and SJM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLXSJM
Company NameThe Clorox CompanyThe J. M. Smucker Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsFood Products
Market Capitalization15.21 billion USD11.65 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973October 31, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLX and SJM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLX vs. SJM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLXSJM
5-Day Price Return-0.02%-1.56%
13-Week Price Return-0.70%10.59%
26-Week Price Return-15.76%-5.14%
52-Week Price Return-24.69%-10.36%
Month-to-Date Return-0.50%-1.73%
Year-to-Date Return-24.46%-1.38%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.16M2.83M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.87M2.25M
3-Month Volatility20.99%28.25%
Beta0.580.23

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLX

453.68%

Household Products Industry

Max
216.14%
Q3
106.01%
Median
19.09%
Q1
9.92%
Min
-6.34%

CLX’s Return on Equity of 453.68% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SJM

-21.99%

Food Products Industry

Max
30.51%
Q3
16.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-2.18%

SJM has a negative Return on Equity of -21.99%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CLX vs. SJM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLX

11.40%

Household Products Industry

Max
14.55%
Q3
12.50%
Median
8.91%
Q1
8.67%
Min
5.05%

CLX’s Net Profit Margin of 11.40% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Household Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SJM

-16.75%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
10.21%
Median
6.29%
Q1
3.53%
Min
-0.80%

SJM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -16.75%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CLX vs. SJM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLX

15.17%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.76%
Q3
16.17%
Median
13.11%
Q1
12.17%
Min
6.87%

CLX’s Operating Profit Margin of 15.17% is around the midpoint for the Household Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SJM

-10.87%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.29%
Median
9.64%
Q1
6.11%
Min
0.08%

SJM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -10.87%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CLX vs. SJM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLXSJM
Return on Equity (TTM)453.68%-21.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)14.63%-7.92%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.40%-16.75%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)15.17%-10.87%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)45.16%35.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLX

0.84

Household Products Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.96
Median
1.21
Q1
0.79
Min
0.50

CLX’s Current Ratio of 0.84 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SJM

0.81

Food Products Industry

Max
3.99
Q3
2.39
Median
1.62
Q1
1.23
Min
0.57

SJM’s Current Ratio of 0.81 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CLX vs. SJM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLX

7.75

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 7.75, CLX operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Household Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

SJM

1.35

Food Products Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.92
Median
0.51
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

SJM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.35. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CLX vs. SJM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLX

8.17

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
17.04
Q1
9.99
Min
5.60

In the lower quartile for the Household Products industry, CLX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.17 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SJM

-1.69

Food Products Industry

Max
65.06
Q3
29.45
Median
9.43
Q1
4.70
Min
-1.69

SJM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.69. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CLX vs. SJM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLXSJM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.840.81
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.570.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)7.751.35
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.17-1.69

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLX vs. SJM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLX vs. SJM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLX

4.03%

Household Products Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.95%
Median
2.83%
Q1
2.02%
Min
1.34%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.03%, CLX offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Household Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

SJM

3.96%

Food Products Industry

Max
8.09%
Q3
4.48%
Median
2.69%
Q1
1.66%
Min
0.00%

SJM’s Dividend Yield of 3.96% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CLX vs. SJM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLX

74.32%

Household Products Industry

Max
187.99%
Q3
110.64%
Median
74.63%
Q1
58.31%
Min
30.76%

CLX’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 74.32% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SJM

59.47%

Food Products Industry

Max
216.00%
Q3
112.15%
Median
72.83%
Q1
41.56%
Min
0.00%

SJM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.47% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CLX vs. SJM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLXSJM
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.03%3.96%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)74.32%59.47%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLX

18.42

Household Products Industry

Max
30.25
Q3
22.11
Median
20.35
Q1
15.19
Min
13.52

CLX’s P/E Ratio of 18.42 is within the middle range for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SJM

--

Food Products Industry

Max
41.70
Q3
24.61
Median
17.81
Q1
12.59
Min
3.07

P/E Ratio data for SJM is currently unavailable.

CLX vs. SJM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLX

2.10

Household Products Industry

Max
4.23
Q3
2.58
Median
1.98
Q1
1.29
Min
1.03

CLX’s P/S Ratio of 2.10 aligns with the market consensus for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SJM

1.33

Food Products Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
1.74
Median
1.10
Q1
0.66
Min
0.11

SJM’s P/S Ratio of 1.33 aligns with the market consensus for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CLX vs. SJM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLX

46.10

Household Products Industry

Max
46.10
Q3
21.55
Median
5.33
Q1
2.16
Min
1.41

CLX’s P/B Ratio of 46.10 is in the upper tier for the Household Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SJM

1.93

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.98
Median
1.93
Q1
1.28
Min
0.47

SJM’s P/B Ratio of 1.93 is within the conventional range for the Food Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CLX vs. SJM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLXSJM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.42--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.101.33
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)46.101.93
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.6114.14