Seek Returns logo

CLSK vs. TOST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLSK and TOST, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLSKTOST
Company NameCleanSpark, Inc.Toast, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustrySoftwareFinancial Services
Market Capitalization2.80 billion USD25.84 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNYSE
Listing DateNovember 16, 2016September 22, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLSK and TOST by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLSK vs. TOST: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLSKTOST
5-Day Price Return-7.00%-2.81%
13-Week Price Return3.64%3.41%
26-Week Price Return-3.95%5.60%
52-Week Price Return-13.00%84.94%
Month-to-Date Return-12.31%-9.23%
Year-to-Date Return8.25%21.62%
10-Day Avg. Volume21.86M10.38M
3-Month Avg. Volume26.10M7.87M
3-Month Volatility70.60%37.76%
Beta3.792.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLSK

15.51%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

CLSK’s Return on Equity of 15.51% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TOST

13.88%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

TOST’s Return on Equity of 13.88% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CLSK vs. TOST: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLSK

47.98%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 47.98% places CLSK in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TOST

4.05%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, TOST’s Net Profit Margin of 4.05% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CLSK vs. TOST: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLSK

39.96%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 39.96% places CLSK in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TOST

3.67%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

TOST’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.67% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CLSK vs. TOST: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLSKTOST
Return on Equity (TTM)15.51%13.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.55%8.99%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)47.98%4.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)39.96%3.67%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.05%25.19%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

4.37

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

CLSK’s Current Ratio of 4.37 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

TOST

2.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CLSK vs. TOST: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

0.38

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CLSK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TOST

0.00

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CLSK vs. TOST: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

-46.66

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

CLSK has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -46.66. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TOST

-3.26

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CLSK vs. TOST: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLSKTOST
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.372.59
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.332.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.380.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-46.66-3.26

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLSK vs. TOST: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLSK vs. TOST: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLSK

0.18%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.18% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

TOST

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TOST currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CLSK vs. TOST: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLSK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TOST

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TOST has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CLSK vs. TOST: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLSKTOST
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.18%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

9.24

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

CLSK’s P/E Ratio of 9.24 is below the typical range for the Software industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

TOST

115.38

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

At 115.38, TOST’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CLSK vs. TOST: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

4.43

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, CLSK’s P/S Ratio of 4.43 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TOST

4.67

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CLSK vs. TOST: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

1.44

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

CLSK’s P/B Ratio of 1.44 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TOST

14.11

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

At 14.11, TOST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CLSK vs. TOST: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLSKTOST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)9.24115.38
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.434.67
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.4414.11
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)46.3050.87