Seek Returns logo

CLSK vs. MS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLSK and MS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLSKMS
Company NameCleanSpark, Inc.Morgan Stanley
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustrySoftwareCapital Markets
Market Capitalization4.10 billion USD255.59 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNYSE
Listing DateNovember 16, 2016February 23, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLSK and MS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLSK vs. MS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLSKMS
5-Day Price Return0.35%-1.30%
13-Week Price Return31.46%11.21%
26-Week Price Return78.57%31.84%
52-Week Price Return43.71%50.51%
Month-to-Date Return53.12%-1.30%
Year-to-Date Return57.44%24.79%
10-Day Avg. Volume40.33M6.01M
3-Month Avg. Volume25.79M5.26M
3-Month Volatility73.23%17.67%
Beta3.751.24

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLSK

15.51%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

CLSK’s Return on Equity of 15.51% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MS

13.95%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
22.24%
Median
13.52%
Q1
8.61%
Min
-4.25%

MS’s Return on Equity of 13.95% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CLSK vs. MS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLSK

47.98%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 47.98% places CLSK in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MS

13.06%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
69.91%
Q3
37.24%
Median
24.30%
Q1
13.06%
Min
-15.18%

MS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.06% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Capital Markets industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CLSK vs. MS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLSK

39.96%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 39.96% places CLSK in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MS

17.07%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
84.86%
Q3
47.16%
Median
32.23%
Q1
18.65%
Min
-21.87%

MS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.07% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CLSK vs. MS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLSKMS
Return on Equity (TTM)15.51%13.95%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.55%1.15%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)47.98%13.06%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)39.96%17.07%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.05%54.42%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

4.37

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

CLSK’s Current Ratio of 4.37 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MS

0.29

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
1.81
Median
1.01
Q1
0.56
Min
0.04

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CLSK vs. MS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

0.38

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CLSK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MS

7.68

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
2.79
Median
0.96
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

CLSK vs. MS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

-46.66

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

CLSK has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -46.66. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MS

1.25

Capital Markets Industry

Max
107.59
Q3
48.41
Median
10.85
Q1
4.56
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

CLSK vs. MS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLSKMS
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.370.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.330.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.387.68
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-46.661.25

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLSK vs. MS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLSK vs. MS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLSK

0.13%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.13%, CLSK offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Software industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MS

2.53%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.02%
Q3
4.54%
Median
2.55%
Q1
1.27%
Min
0.00%

MS’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CLSK vs. MS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLSK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MS

43.20%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
199.38%
Q3
99.28%
Median
60.67%
Q1
32.00%
Min
0.00%

MS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 43.20% is within the typical range for the Capital Markets industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CLSK vs. MS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLSKMS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.13%2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%43.20%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

13.55

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, CLSK’s P/E Ratio of 13.55 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MS

17.10

Capital Markets Industry

Max
51.69
Q3
29.42
Median
17.58
Q1
12.55
Min
5.59

MS’s P/E Ratio of 17.10 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CLSK vs. MS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

6.50

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

CLSK’s P/S Ratio of 6.50 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MS

2.23

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.65
Q3
7.29
Median
4.53
Q1
2.26
Min
0.04

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, MS’s P/S Ratio of 2.23 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CLSK vs. MS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

1.44

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

CLSK’s P/B Ratio of 1.44 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MS

2.08

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.83
Q3
5.12
Median
2.66
Q1
1.19
Min
0.37

MS’s P/B Ratio of 2.08 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CLSK vs. MS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLSKMS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)13.5517.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.502.23
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.442.08
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)67.8911.47