Seek Returns logo

CLSK vs. LDOS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLSK and LDOS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLSKLDOS
Company NameCleanSpark, Inc.Leidos Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustrySoftwareProfessional Services
Market Capitalization4.10 billion USD24.59 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNYSE
Listing DateNovember 16, 2016October 17, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLSK and LDOS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLSK vs. LDOS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLSKLDOS
5-Day Price Return0.35%0.83%
13-Week Price Return31.46%19.78%
26-Week Price Return78.57%38.59%
52-Week Price Return43.71%18.31%
Month-to-Date Return53.12%4.44%
Year-to-Date Return57.44%31.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume40.33M1.05M
3-Month Avg. Volume25.79M0.99M
3-Month Volatility73.23%21.70%
Beta3.750.71

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLSK

15.51%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

CLSK’s Return on Equity of 15.51% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LDOS

31.25%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

LDOS’s Return on Equity of 31.25% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CLSK vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLSK

47.98%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 47.98% places CLSK in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LDOS

8.22%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

LDOS’s Net Profit Margin of 8.22% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CLSK vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLSK

39.96%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 39.96% places CLSK in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LDOS

11.95%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

LDOS’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.95% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CLSK vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLSKLDOS
Return on Equity (TTM)15.51%31.25%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.55%10.54%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)47.98%8.22%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)39.96%11.95%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.05%17.56%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

4.37

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

CLSK’s Current Ratio of 4.37 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

LDOS

1.62

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

LDOS’s Current Ratio of 1.62 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CLSK vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

0.38

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CLSK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LDOS

1.09

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

LDOS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.09 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CLSK vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

-46.66

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

CLSK has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -46.66. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

LDOS

11.64

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

LDOS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CLSK vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLSKLDOS
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.371.62
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.331.50
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.381.09
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-46.6611.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLSK vs. LDOS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLSK vs. LDOS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLSK

0.13%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.13%, CLSK offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Software industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

LDOS

0.87%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Yield of 0.87% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CLSK vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLSK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LDOS

14.91%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.91% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CLSK vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLSKLDOS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.13%0.87%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%14.91%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

13.55

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, CLSK’s P/E Ratio of 13.55 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LDOS

17.21

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, LDOS’s P/E Ratio of 17.21 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CLSK vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

6.50

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

CLSK’s P/S Ratio of 6.50 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LDOS

1.42

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

LDOS’s P/S Ratio of 1.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CLSK vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

1.44

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

CLSK’s P/B Ratio of 1.44 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LDOS

4.54

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

LDOS’s P/B Ratio of 4.54 is within the conventional range for the Professional Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CLSK vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLSKLDOS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)13.5517.21
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.501.42
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.444.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)67.8918.02