CLSK vs. FUTU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 12, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CLSK and FUTU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CLSK is a standard domestic listing, while FUTU trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	CLSK	FUTU
Company Name	CleanSpark, Inc.	Futu Holdings Limited
Country	United States	Hong Kong
GICS Sector	Information Technology	Financials
GICS Industry	Software	Capital Markets
Market Capitalization	5.33 billion USD	24.87 billion USD
Exchange	NasdaqCM	NasdaqGM
Listing Date	November 16, 2016	March 8, 2019
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLSK and FUTU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLSK vs. FUTU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CLSK	FUTU
5-Day Price Return	25.36%	7.46%
13-Week Price Return	52.21%	25.46%
26-Week Price Return	156.14%	83.25%
52-Week Price Return	98.12%	38.56%
Month-to-Date Return	30.90%	2.73%
Year-to-Date Return	106.08%	123.34%
10-Day Avg. Volume	36.94M	2.64M
3-Month Avg. Volume	26.39M	2.40M
3-Month Volatility	70.74%	52.53%
Beta	3.73	0.20

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLSK

15.51%

Software Industry

Max: 66.28%
Q3: 21.28%
Median: 9.33%
Q1: -8.77%
Min: -48.16%

CLSK’s Return on Equity of 15.51% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FUTU

26.37%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 22.24%
Median: 13.52%
Q1: 8.61%
Min: -4.25%

In the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FUTU’s Return on Equity of 26.37% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CLSK vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLSK

47.98%

Software Industry

Max: 51.92%
Q3: 19.23%
Median: 6.98%
Q1: -7.14%
Min: -41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 47.98% places CLSK in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FUTU

40.05%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 69.91%
Q3: 37.24%
Median: 24.30%
Q1: 13.06%
Min: -15.18%

A Net Profit Margin of 40.05% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CLSK vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLSK

39.96%

Software Industry

Max: 60.40%
Q3: 21.25%
Median: 9.90%
Q1: -4.97%
Min: -43.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 39.96% places CLSK in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FUTU

48.72%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 84.86%
Q3: 47.16%
Median: 32.23%
Q1: 18.65%
Min: -21.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 48.72% places FUTU in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CLSK vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CLSK	FUTU
Return on Equity (TTM)	15.51%	26.37%
Return on Assets (TTM)	11.55%	4.65%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	47.98%	40.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	39.96%	48.72%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	52.05%	82.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

4.37

Software Industry

Max: 4.29
Q3: 2.37
Median: 1.40
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.25

CLSK’s Current Ratio of 4.37 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

FUTU

1.18

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.37
Q3: 1.81
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.56
Min: 0.04

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CLSK vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

0.38

Software Industry

Max: 2.16
Q3: 0.86
Median: 0.31
Q1: 0.00
Min: 0.00

CLSK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FUTU

0.28

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.52
Q3: 2.79
Median: 0.96
Q1: 0.28
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

CLSK vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

-46.66

Software Industry

Max: 89.65
Q3: 32.64
Median: 1.00
Q1: -9.84
Min: -71.23

CLSK has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -46.66. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FUTU

4,725.16

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 107.59
Q3: 48.41
Median: 10.85
Q1: 4.56
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

CLSK vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CLSK	FUTU
Current Ratio (MRQ)	4.37	1.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	4.33	1.18
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.38	0.28
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	-46.66	4,725.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLSK vs. FUTU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLSK vs. FUTU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLSK

0.10%

Software Industry

Max: 0.22%
Q3: 0.11%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CLSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is consistent with its peers in the Software industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.02%
Q3: 4.54%
Median: 2.55%
Q1: 1.27%
Min: 0.00%

FUTU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CLSK vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

0.00%

Software Industry

Max: 3.29%
Q3: 2.41%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CLSK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FUTU

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 199.38%
Q3: 99.28%
Median: 60.67%
Q1: 32.00%
Min: 0.00%

FUTU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CLSK vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CLSK	FUTU
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.10%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

17.76

Software Industry

Max: 145.74
Q3: 94.88
Median: 45.35
Q1: 26.66
Min: 8.80

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, CLSK’s P/E Ratio of 17.76 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FUTU

23.41

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 51.69
Q3: 29.42
Median: 17.58
Q1: 12.55
Min: 5.59

FUTU’s P/E Ratio of 23.41 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CLSK vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

8.52

Software Industry

Max: 25.67
Q3: 13.68
Median: 8.28
Q1: 4.95
Min: 0.90

CLSK’s P/S Ratio of 8.52 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FUTU

13.63

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.65
Q3: 7.29
Median: 4.53
Q1: 2.26
Min: 0.04

FUTU’s P/S Ratio of 13.63 is in the upper echelon for the Capital Markets industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CLSK vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

1.44

Software Industry

Max: 30.67
Q3: 14.92
Median: 8.52
Q1: 3.89
Min: 0.38

CLSK’s P/B Ratio of 1.44 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FUTU

2.74

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.83
Q3: 5.12
Median: 2.66
Q1: 1.19
Min: 0.37

FUTU’s P/B Ratio of 2.74 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CLSK vs. FUTU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CLSK	FUTU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	17.76	23.41
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	8.52	13.63
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.44	2.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	88.98	9.07