Seek Returns logo

CLSK vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLSK and FTV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLSKFTV
Company NameCleanSpark, Inc.Fortive Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustrySoftwareMachinery
Market Capitalization2.66 billion USD16.41 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNYSE
Listing DateNovember 16, 2016July 5, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLSK and FTV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLSK vs. FTV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLSKFTV
5-Day Price Return0.96%0.73%
13-Week Price Return-4.26%-30.85%
26-Week Price Return-4.45%-41.54%
52-Week Price Return-23.85%-33.03%
Month-to-Date Return-16.89%1.21%
Year-to-Date Return2.61%-35.32%
10-Day Avg. Volume18.01M4.65M
3-Month Avg. Volume25.45M3.83M
3-Month Volatility70.03%54.78%
Beta3.801.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLSK

15.51%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

CLSK’s Return on Equity of 15.51% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CLSK vs. FTV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLSK

47.98%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 47.98% places CLSK in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CLSK vs. FTV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLSK

39.96%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 39.96% places CLSK in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CLSK vs. FTV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLSKFTV
Return on Equity (TTM)15.51%7.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.55%4.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)47.98%12.51%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)39.96%17.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.05%59.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

4.37

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

CLSK’s Current Ratio of 4.37 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CLSK vs. FTV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

0.38

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CLSK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CLSK vs. FTV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

-46.66

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

CLSK has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -46.66. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CLSK vs. FTV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLSKFTV
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.370.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.330.77
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.380.46
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-46.666.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLSK vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLSK vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLSK

0.19%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.19% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

FTV

0.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.67% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CLSK vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLSK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CLSK vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLSKFTV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.19%0.67%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%14.22%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

8.77

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

CLSK’s P/E Ratio of 8.77 is below the typical range for the Software industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

FTV

21.25

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.25 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CLSK vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

4.21

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, CLSK’s P/S Ratio of 4.21 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FTV

2.66

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.66 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CLSK vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

1.44

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

CLSK’s P/B Ratio of 1.44 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CLSK vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLSKFTV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)8.7721.25
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.212.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.442.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)43.9311.79