Seek Returns logo

CLSK vs. FOUR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLSK and FOUR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLSKFOUR
Company NameCleanSpark, Inc.Shift4 Payments, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustrySoftwareFinancial Services
Market Capitalization4.10 billion USD6.95 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNYSE
Listing DateNovember 16, 2016June 5, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLSK and FOUR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLSK vs. FOUR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLSKFOUR
5-Day Price Return0.35%-4.36%
13-Week Price Return31.46%-21.91%
26-Week Price Return78.57%-10.20%
52-Week Price Return43.71%-11.90%
Month-to-Date Return53.12%-14.41%
Year-to-Date Return57.44%-25.42%
10-Day Avg. Volume40.33M2.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume25.79M1.68M
3-Month Volatility73.23%40.59%
Beta3.751.72

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLSK

15.51%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

CLSK’s Return on Equity of 15.51% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FOUR

21.96%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, FOUR’s Return on Equity of 21.96% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CLSK vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLSK

47.98%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 47.98% places CLSK in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FOUR

6.11%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

FOUR’s Net Profit Margin of 6.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CLSK vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLSK

39.96%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 39.96% places CLSK in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FOUR

7.53%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

FOUR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.53% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CLSK vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLSKFOUR
Return on Equity (TTM)15.51%21.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.55%3.99%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)47.98%6.11%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)39.96%7.53%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.05%30.55%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

4.37

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

CLSK’s Current Ratio of 4.37 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

FOUR

2.53

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CLSK vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

0.38

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CLSK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FOUR

2.34

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CLSK vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

-46.66

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

CLSK has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -46.66. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

FOUR

14.17

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CLSK vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLSKFOUR
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.372.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.332.49
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.382.34
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-46.6614.17

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLSK vs. FOUR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLSK vs. FOUR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLSK

0.13%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.13%, CLSK offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Software industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

FOUR

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FOUR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CLSK vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLSK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FOUR

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FOUR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CLSK vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLSKFOUR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.13%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

13.55

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, CLSK’s P/E Ratio of 13.55 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

FOUR

30.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

A P/E Ratio of 30.76 places FOUR in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CLSK vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

6.50

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

CLSK’s P/S Ratio of 6.50 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FOUR

1.88

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CLSK vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

1.44

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

CLSK’s P/B Ratio of 1.44 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FOUR

5.45

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

FOUR’s P/B Ratio of 5.45 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CLSK vs. FOUR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLSKFOUR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)13.5530.76
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.501.88
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.445.45
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)67.8917.82