Seek Returns logo

CLSK vs. ERIC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLSK and ERIC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CLSK is a standard domestic listing, while ERIC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCLSKERIC
Company NameCleanSpark, Inc.Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
CountryUnited StatesSweden
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareCommunications Equipment
Market Capitalization2.67 billion USD25.74 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqCMNasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 16, 2016August 24, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLSK and ERIC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLSK vs. ERIC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLSKERIC
5-Day Price Return-4.62%1.36%
13-Week Price Return-3.56%-10.72%
26-Week Price Return-11.06%-11.99%
52-Week Price Return-19.85%1.44%
Month-to-Date Return-16.53%4.32%
Year-to-Date Return3.04%-17.20%
10-Day Avg. Volume22.00M3.48M
3-Month Avg. Volume25.65M6.34M
3-Month Volatility69.34%26.67%
Beta3.810.77

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLSK

15.51%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

CLSK’s Return on Equity of 15.51% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ERIC

19.57%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

ERIC’s Return on Equity of 19.57% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CLSK vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLSK

47.98%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 47.98% places CLSK in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ERIC

7.04%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

ERIC’s Net Profit Margin of 7.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CLSK vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLSK

39.96%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 39.96% places CLSK in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ERIC

10.60%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

ERIC’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.60% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CLSK vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLSKERIC
Return on Equity (TTM)15.51%19.57%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.55%6.22%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)47.98%7.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)39.96%10.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.05%47.18%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

4.37

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

CLSK’s Current Ratio of 4.37 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Software industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

ERIC

1.09

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

ERIC’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CLSK vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

0.38

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

CLSK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ERIC

0.50

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

ERIC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CLSK vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

-46.66

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

CLSK has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -46.66. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ERIC

3.82

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

ERIC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.82 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CLSK vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLSKERIC
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.371.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)4.330.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.380.50
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-46.663.82

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLSK vs. ERIC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLSK vs. ERIC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLSK

0.19%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.19% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

ERIC

3.73%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.73%, ERIC offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CLSK vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLSK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ERIC

70.91%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ERIC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 70.91% is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CLSK vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLSKERIC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.19%3.73%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%70.91%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

8.77

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

CLSK’s P/E Ratio of 8.77 is below the typical range for the Software industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

ERIC

14.44

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

In the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ERIC’s P/E Ratio of 14.44 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CLSK vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLSK

4.21

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, CLSK’s P/S Ratio of 4.21 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ERIC

1.02

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

ERIC’s P/S Ratio of 1.02 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CLSK vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLSK

1.44

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

CLSK’s P/B Ratio of 1.44 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ERIC

3.15

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

ERIC’s P/B Ratio of 3.15 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CLSK vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLSKERIC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)8.7714.44
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.211.02
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.443.15
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)43.936.44