Seek Returns logo

CLS vs. TTD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLS and TTD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLSTTD
Company NameCelestica Inc.The Trade Desk, Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsMedia
Market Capitalization35.97 billion USD20.12 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGM
Listing DateJune 30, 1998September 21, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLS and TTD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLS vs. TTD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLSTTD
5-Day Price Return-9.93%-3.07%
13-Week Price Return60.15%-19.55%
26-Week Price Return209.98%-46.34%
52-Week Price Return283.87%-67.05%
Month-to-Date Return-9.91%-16.61%
Year-to-Date Return227.91%-64.32%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.78M15.43M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.89M16.43M
3-Month Volatility65.66%46.01%
Beta2.521.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLS

39.60%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.62%
Q3
13.32%
Median
9.23%
Q1
4.70%
Min
-3.60%

CLS’s Return on Equity of 39.60% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TTD

16.00%

Media Industry

Max
33.19%
Q3
16.27%
Median
10.95%
Q1
4.58%
Min
-3.13%

TTD’s Return on Equity of 16.00% is on par with the norm for the Media industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CLS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLS

6.35%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
18.22%
Q3
10.34%
Median
7.81%
Q1
3.28%
Min
-4.57%

CLS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TTD

15.72%

Media Industry

Max
20.69%
Q3
12.32%
Median
6.50%
Q1
2.54%
Min
-4.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.72% places TTD in the upper quartile for the Media industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CLS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLS

8.23%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
26.64%
Q3
15.10%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-7.07%

CLS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.23% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TTD

18.91%

Media Industry

Max
24.30%
Q3
13.69%
Median
9.11%
Q1
4.72%
Min
-6.28%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.91% places TTD in the upper quartile for the Media industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CLS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLSTTD
Return on Equity (TTM)39.60%16.00%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.62%7.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.35%15.72%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.23%18.91%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)12.04%78.81%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

1.47

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.52
Q3
3.20
Median
2.02
Q1
1.51
Min
0.33

CLS’s Current Ratio of 1.47 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TTD

1.71

Media Industry

Max
3.59
Q3
2.01
Median
1.08
Q1
0.82
Min
0.24

TTD’s Current Ratio of 1.71 aligns with the median group of the Media industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CLS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

0.39

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.12
Q3
0.55
Median
0.33
Q1
0.10
Min
0.00

CLS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 is typical for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TTD

0.00

Media Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.08
Median
0.55
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Media industry, TTD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CLS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLS

36.72

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
114.40
Q3
51.32
Median
14.03
Q1
3.74
Min
-61.15

CLS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.72 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TTD

44.57

Media Industry

Max
44.57
Q3
24.75
Median
4.58
Q1
2.20
Min
-10.82

TTD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 44.57 is in the upper quartile for the Media industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CLS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLSTTD
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.471.71
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.881.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.390.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)36.7244.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLS vs. TTD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLS vs. TTD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLS

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.16%
Q3
2.39%
Median
1.18%
Q1
0.12%
Min
0.00%

CLS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TTD

0.00%

Media Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.91%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CLS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLS

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
197.57%
Q3
87.33%
Median
36.23%
Q1
3.99%
Min
0.00%

CLS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TTD

0.00%

Media Industry

Max
165.03%
Q3
102.15%
Median
45.64%
Q1
13.96%
Min
0.00%

TTD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CLS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLSTTD
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLS

49.78

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
71.05
Q3
42.87
Median
27.84
Q1
19.17
Min
7.73

A P/E Ratio of 49.78 places CLS in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TTD

45.16

Media Industry

Max
49.10
Q3
32.11
Median
14.41
Q1
12.15
Min
4.42

A P/E Ratio of 45.16 places TTD in the upper quartile for the Media industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CLS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLS

3.16

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.81
Q3
4.01
Median
2.09
Q1
1.25
Min
0.16

CLS’s P/S Ratio of 3.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TTD

7.10

Media Industry

Max
3.94
Q3
2.46
Median
1.16
Q1
0.86
Min
0.20

With a P/S Ratio of 7.10, TTD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Media industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CLS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

13.85

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.49
Q3
4.09
Median
2.35
Q1
1.55
Min
0.44

At 13.85, CLS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TTD

9.21

Media Industry

Max
4.74
Q3
2.57
Median
1.75
Q1
1.06
Min
0.56

At 9.21, TTD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Media industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CLS vs. TTD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Media industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLSTTD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)49.7845.16
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.167.10
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)13.859.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)89.6029.19