Seek Returns logo

CLS vs. SONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLS and SONY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CLS is a standard domestic listing, while SONY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCLSSONY
Company NameCelestica Inc.Sony Group Corporation
CountryCanadaJapan
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization23.49 billion USD167.68 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 30, 1998February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLS and SONY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLS vs. SONY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLSSONY
5-Day Price Return7.73%10.03%
13-Week Price Return126.89%11.14%
26-Week Price Return43.11%16.05%
52-Week Price Return335.42%13.72%
Month-to-Date Return6.23%8.42%
Year-to-Date Return121.82%18.49%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.06M16.17M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.87M15.29M
3-Month Volatility54.67%30.35%
Beta2.980.28

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLS

30.66%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

CLS’s Return on Equity of 30.66% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SONY

14.17%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

SONY’s Return on Equity of 14.17% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CLS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLS

5.09%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

CLS’s Net Profit Margin of 5.09% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SONY

9.13%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.13% places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CLS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLS

7.01%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

CLS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.01% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SONY

11.68%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

SONY’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.68% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CLS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLSSONY
Return on Equity (TTM)30.66%14.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.98%3.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.09%9.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.01%11.68%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)11.36%31.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

1.44

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

CLS’s Current Ratio of 1.44 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SONY

1.09

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

SONY’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CLS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

0.50

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

CLS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SONY

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CLS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLS

36.72

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

CLS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.72 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SONY

104.18

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SONY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 104.18 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CLS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLSSONY
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.441.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.861.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.500.19
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)36.72104.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLS vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLS vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLS

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

CLS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SONY

0.49%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Yield of 0.49% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CLS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLS

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

CLS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SONY

10.52%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.52% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CLS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLSSONY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.49%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%10.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLS

45.70

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

A P/E Ratio of 45.70 places CLS in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

SONY

21.27

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 21.27 places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CLS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLS

2.32

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

CLS’s P/S Ratio of 2.32 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SONY

1.94

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

SONY’s P/S Ratio of 1.94 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CLS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

10.12

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 10.12, CLS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SONY

2.77

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

SONY’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Household Durables industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CLS vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLSSONY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)45.7021.27
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.321.94
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.122.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)63.7212.12