Seek Returns logo

CLS vs. LDOS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLS and LDOS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLSLDOS
Company NameCelestica Inc.Leidos Holdings, Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsProfessional Services
Market Capitalization35.97 billion USD24.43 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 30, 1998October 17, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLS and LDOS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLS vs. LDOS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLSLDOS
5-Day Price Return-9.93%-2.77%
13-Week Price Return60.15%7.76%
26-Week Price Return209.98%23.15%
52-Week Price Return283.87%-1.54%
Month-to-Date Return-9.91%0.49%
Year-to-Date Return227.91%32.87%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.78M0.91M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.89M0.81M
3-Month Volatility65.66%20.53%
Beta2.520.59

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLS

39.60%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.62%
Q3
13.32%
Median
9.23%
Q1
4.70%
Min
-3.60%

CLS’s Return on Equity of 39.60% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LDOS

32.62%

Professional Services Industry

Max
50.82%
Q3
32.98%
Median
21.73%
Q1
12.35%
Min
-10.69%

LDOS’s Return on Equity of 32.62% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CLS vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLS

6.35%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
18.22%
Q3
10.34%
Median
7.81%
Q1
3.28%
Min
-4.57%

CLS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LDOS

8.22%

Professional Services Industry

Max
27.86%
Q3
14.27%
Median
7.71%
Q1
4.47%
Min
-9.49%

LDOS’s Net Profit Margin of 8.22% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CLS vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLS

8.23%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
26.64%
Q3
15.10%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-7.07%

CLS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.23% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LDOS

11.95%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.71%
Q3
19.52%
Median
12.30%
Q1
7.86%
Min
-1.29%

LDOS’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.95% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CLS vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLSLDOS
Return on Equity (TTM)39.60%32.62%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.62%11.12%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.35%8.22%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.23%11.95%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)12.04%17.56%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

1.47

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.52
Q3
3.20
Median
2.02
Q1
1.51
Min
0.33

CLS’s Current Ratio of 1.47 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LDOS

3.02

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.69
Median
1.33
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

LDOS’s Current Ratio of 3.02 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CLS vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

0.39

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.12
Q3
0.55
Median
0.33
Q1
0.10
Min
0.00

CLS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.39 is typical for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LDOS

0.00

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.54
Median
0.94
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, LDOS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CLS vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLS

36.72

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
114.40
Q3
51.32
Median
14.03
Q1
3.74
Min
-61.15

CLS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.72 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LDOS

11.64

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.05
Median
11.35
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

LDOS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CLS vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLSLDOS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.473.02
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.882.56
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.390.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)36.7211.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLS vs. LDOS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLS vs. LDOS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLS

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.16%
Q3
2.39%
Median
1.18%
Q1
0.12%
Min
0.00%

CLS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LDOS

1.07%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.35%
Q3
2.86%
Median
1.57%
Q1
0.72%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Yield of 1.07% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CLS vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLS

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
197.57%
Q3
87.33%
Median
36.23%
Q1
3.99%
Min
0.00%

CLS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LDOS

18.69%

Professional Services Industry

Max
99.60%
Q3
69.06%
Median
43.41%
Q1
19.44%
Min
0.00%

LDOS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.69% is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CLS vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLSLDOS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.07%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%18.69%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLS

49.78

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
71.05
Q3
42.87
Median
27.84
Q1
19.17
Min
7.73

A P/E Ratio of 49.78 places CLS in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

LDOS

32.54

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.91
Q3
32.20
Median
25.00
Q1
17.95
Min
6.60

A P/E Ratio of 32.54 places LDOS in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CLS vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLS

3.16

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.81
Q3
4.01
Median
2.09
Q1
1.25
Min
0.16

CLS’s P/S Ratio of 3.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LDOS

1.44

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.52
Q3
4.25
Median
2.07
Q1
0.84
Min
0.18

LDOS’s P/S Ratio of 1.44 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CLS vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

13.85

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.49
Q3
4.09
Median
2.35
Q1
1.55
Min
0.44

At 13.85, CLS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

LDOS

131.20

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.65
Q3
9.28
Median
6.16
Q1
2.96
Min
0.53

At 131.20, LDOS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CLS vs. LDOS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLSLDOS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)49.7832.54
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.161.44
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)13.85131.20
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)89.6017.63