Seek Returns logo

CLS vs. HOOD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLS and HOOD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLSHOOD
Company NameCelestica Inc.Robinhood Markets, Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsCapital Markets
Market Capitalization23.49 billion USD96.53 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 30, 1998July 29, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLS and HOOD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLS vs. HOOD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLSHOOD
5-Day Price Return7.73%-2.35%
13-Week Price Return126.89%89.13%
26-Week Price Return43.11%104.29%
52-Week Price Return335.42%485.87%
Month-to-Date Return6.23%5.41%
Year-to-Date Return121.82%191.52%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.06M45.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.87M45.47M
3-Month Volatility54.67%55.10%
Beta2.982.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLS

30.66%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

CLS’s Return on Equity of 30.66% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

HOOD

22.92%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
21.61%
Median
13.77%
Q1
8.31%
Min
-4.25%

In the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, HOOD’s Return on Equity of 22.92% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CLS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLS

5.09%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

CLS’s Net Profit Margin of 5.09% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HOOD

50.13%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
66.67%
Q3
35.11%
Median
23.49%
Q1
13.63%
Min
-15.18%

A Net Profit Margin of 50.13% places HOOD in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CLS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLS

7.01%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

CLS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.01% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HOOD

42.50%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
86.40%
Q3
46.46%
Median
32.80%
Q1
18.32%
Min
-21.87%

HOOD’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.50% is around the midpoint for the Capital Markets industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CLS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLSHOOD
Return on Equity (TTM)30.66%22.92%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.98%5.41%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.09%50.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.01%42.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)11.36%94.76%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

1.44

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

CLS’s Current Ratio of 1.44 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HOOD

1.25

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
1.89
Median
1.01
Q1
0.54
Min
-0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CLS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

0.50

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

CLS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HOOD

1.57

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.62
Q3
2.84
Median
1.02
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

CLS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLS

36.72

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

CLS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.72 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

HOOD

--

Capital Markets Industry

Max
126.03
Q3
60.98
Median
11.77
Q1
4.95
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

CLS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLSHOOD
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.441.25
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.861.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.501.57
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)36.72--

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLS vs. HOOD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLS vs. HOOD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLS

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

CLS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HOOD

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.26%
Q3
4.86%
Median
2.78%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

HOOD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CLS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLS

0.00%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

CLS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HOOD

0.00%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
200.72%
Q3
101.92%
Median
57.97%
Q1
32.36%
Min
0.00%

HOOD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CLS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLSHOOD
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLS

45.70

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

A P/E Ratio of 45.70 places CLS in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

HOOD

53.99

Capital Markets Industry

Max
58.89
Q3
31.00
Median
18.54
Q1
12.09
Min
5.24

A P/E Ratio of 53.99 places HOOD in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CLS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLS

2.32

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

CLS’s P/S Ratio of 2.32 aligns with the market consensus for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HOOD

27.06

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.49
Q3
7.41
Median
4.68
Q1
2.25
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 27.06, HOOD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Capital Markets industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CLS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLS

10.12

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 10.12, CLS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

HOOD

10.24

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
4.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.21
Min
0.38

At 10.24, HOOD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Capital Markets industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CLS vs. HOOD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLSHOOD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)45.7053.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.3227.06
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.1210.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)63.7216.32