Seek Returns

CLH vs. TRI: Clean Harbors vs. Thomson Reuters Stock Comparison

How do Clean Harbors (CLH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Clean Harbors (CLH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI) both fall under the Commercial & Professional Services industry group, but CLH is classified in Commercial Services & Supplies while TRI is classified in Professional Services.

Company profile comparison for Clean Harbors (CLH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
Profile ItemCLHTRI
NameClean Harbors, Inc.Thomson Reuters Corporation
Country/RegionUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCommercial & Professional ServicesCommercial & Professional Services
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesProfessional Services
GICS Sub-IndustryEnvironmental & Facilities ServicesResearch & Consulting Services
Market Capitalization14.98 billion USD48.79 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaq
Listing DateNovember 24, 1987June 12, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CLH
TRI
GSPC
Loading price history…
Clean Harbors (CLH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Clean Harbors (CLH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Clean Harbors (CLH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Clean Harbors (CLH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricCLHTRI
Total Return (1Y)38.70%-16.97%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)22.86%-3.77%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)21.84%0.07%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CLH
TRI
GSPC
Loading price history…
Clean Harbors (CLH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Clean Harbors (CLH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Clean Harbors (CLH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricCLHTRI
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)25.31%52.25%
Beta (5Y)0.870.73
Max Drawdown (5Y)-30.86%-62.87%
Avg. Volume (3M)465.54K1.62M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CLH and TRI are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Clean Harbors (CLH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricCLHTRI
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.36-0.41
Sortino Ratio (1Y)2.09-0.58

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Clean Harbors (CLH) at 17.93% and Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 14.11% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

CLH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

17.93%

Max
47.06%
Q3
25.43%
CLH
17.93%
Median
14.11%
Q1
3.92%
Min
-20.15%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

14.11%

Max
47.06%
Q3
25.43%
TRI
14.11%
Median
14.11%
Q1
3.92%
Min
-20.15%
Loading chart…
Clean Harbors (CLH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their ROE against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 19.69% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Clean Harbors (CLH) at 8.05%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

CLH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

8.05%

Max
23.28%
Q3
11.35%
CLH
8.05%
Median
5.65%
Q1
0.87%
Min
-8.60%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

19.69%

Max
23.28%
TRI
19.69%
Q3
11.35%
Median
5.65%
Q1
0.87%
Min
-8.60%
Loading chart…
Clean Harbors (CLH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their net margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 21.93% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Clean Harbors (CLH) at 17.02%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

CLH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

17.02%

Max
38.50%
Q3
18.84%
CLH
17.02%
Median
10.40%
Q1
5.59%
Min
-12.00%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

21.93%

Max
38.50%
TRI
21.93%
Q3
18.84%
Median
10.40%
Q1
5.59%
Min
-12.00%
Loading chart…
Clean Harbors (CLH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their operating margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Clean Harbors (CLH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricCLHTRI
ROE (TTM)17.93%14.11%
ROA (TTM)6.94%6.96%
Net Margin (TTM)8.05%19.69%
Operating Margin (TTM)17.02%21.93%
Gross Margin (TTM)33.13%39.72%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Clean Harbors (CLH) at 2.39% and Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 3.00% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Clean Harbors (CLH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Clean Harbors (CLH) at -1.89% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at -31.90% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Clean Harbors (CLH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Clean Harbors (CLH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricCLHTRI
Revenue Growth (YoY)2.39%3.00%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)5.29%4.10%
EPS Growth (YoY)-1.89%-31.90%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-1.25%3.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Clean Harbors (CLH) at 1.95 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 1.08 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for TRI.

CLH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.95

Max
3.63
Q3
2.14
CLH
1.95
Median
1.55
Q1
1.09
Min
0.45

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.08

Max
3.63
Q3
2.14
Median
1.55
Q1
1.09
TRI
1.08
Min
0.45
Loading chart…
Clean Harbors (CLH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their current ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Clean Harbors (CLH) at 1.08 and Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 0.36 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

CLH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.08

Max
2.37
Q3
1.25
CLH
1.08
Median
0.88
Q1
0.35
Min
0.00

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.36

Max
2.37
Q3
1.25
Median
0.88
TRI
0.36
Q1
0.35
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Clean Harbors (CLH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Clean Harbors (CLH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricCLHTRI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.951.08
Debt / Equity (MRQ)1.080.36
Net Debt / EBITDA2.121.17

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Clean Harbors (CLH) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Thomson Reuters (TRI) reports a yield of 2.18%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CLH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.00%

Max
4.33%
Q3
1.80%
Median
0.60%
CLH
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.18%

Max
4.33%
TRI
2.18%
Q3
1.80%
Median
0.60%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Clean Harbors (CLH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Clean Harbors (CLH) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Thomson Reuters (TRI) reports a payout of 79.09%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CLH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.00%

Max
99.58%
Q3
41.99%
Median
17.27%
CLH
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-17.94%

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

79.09%

Max
99.58%
TRI
79.09%
Q3
41.99%
Median
17.27%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-17.94%
Loading chart…
Clean Harbors (CLH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Clean Harbors (CLH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricCLHTRI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%79.09%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Clean Harbors (CLH) at 28.50 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 34.53 sits in the richer quartile — TRI needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

CLH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

28.50

Max
49.47
Q3
33.76
CLH
28.50
Median
24.16
Q1
16.01
Min
1.89

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

34.53

Max
49.47
TRI
34.53
Q3
33.76
Median
24.16
Q1
16.01
Min
1.89
Loading chart…
Clean Harbors (CLH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Clean Harbors (CLH) at 2.28 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 6.09 sits in the pricier quartile — TRI costs more per dollar of sales.

CLH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.28

Max
7.17
Q3
3.35
CLH
2.28
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.11

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

6.09

Max
7.17
TRI
6.09
Q3
3.35
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.11
Loading chart…
Clean Harbors (CLH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Clean Harbors (CLH) at 4.81 and Thomson Reuters (TRI) at 4.35 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

CLH

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

4.81

Max
11.25
Q3
6.08
CLH
4.81
Median
2.92
Q1
1.55
Min
-2.78

TRI

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

4.35

Max
11.25
Q3
6.08
TRI
4.35
Median
2.92
Q1
1.55
Min
-2.78
Loading chart…
Clean Harbors (CLH) vs. Thomson Reuters (TRI): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Clean Harbors (CLH) and Thomson Reuters (TRI)
MetricCLHTRI
P/E Ratio (TTM)28.5034.53
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.286.09
P/B Ratio (MRQ)4.814.35
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)2.76%2.27%