Seek Returns logo

CLH vs. SYM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLH and SYM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLHSYM
Company NameClean Harbors, Inc.Symbotic Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesMachinery
Market Capitalization13.43 billion USD31.70 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGM
Listing DateNovember 24, 1987March 9, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLH and SYM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLH vs. SYM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLHSYM
5-Day Price Return3.44%-0.98%
13-Week Price Return9.58%106.46%
26-Week Price Return5.73%106.54%
52-Week Price Return8.44%152.85%
Month-to-Date Return6.20%-0.50%
Year-to-Date Return8.82%126.40%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.44M3.22M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.40M2.02M
3-Month Volatility17.66%89.10%
Beta1.212.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLH

14.82%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

CLH’s Return on Equity of 14.82% is on par with the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SYM

-7.69%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

SYM has a negative Return on Equity of -7.69%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CLH vs. SYM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLH

6.48%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

CLH’s Net Profit Margin of 6.48% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SYM

-0.71%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

SYM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.71%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CLH vs. SYM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLH

10.95%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

CLH’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.95% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SYM

-5.20%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

SYM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.20%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CLH vs. SYM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLHSYM
Return on Equity (TTM)14.82%-7.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.24%-0.88%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.48%-0.71%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)10.95%-5.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.76%16.30%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLH

2.45

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

CLH’s Current Ratio of 2.45 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

SYM

1.08

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

SYM’s Current Ratio of 1.08 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CLH vs. SYM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLH

1.02

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

CLH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.02 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SYM

0.00

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, SYM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CLH vs. SYM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLH

4.95

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

CLH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.95 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SYM

--

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

Interest Coverage Ratio data for SYM is currently unavailable.

CLH vs. SYM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLHSYM
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.451.08
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.970.90
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.020.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.95--

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLH vs. SYM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLH vs. SYM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLH

0.00%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

CLH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SYM

0.00%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

SYM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CLH vs. SYM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLH

0.00%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

CLH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SYM

0.00%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

SYM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CLH vs. SYM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLHSYM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLH

34.44

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

CLH’s P/E Ratio of 34.44 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SYM

--

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

P/E Ratio data for SYM is currently unavailable.

CLH vs. SYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLH

2.23

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

CLH’s P/S Ratio of 2.23 aligns with the market consensus for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SYM

14.35

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 14.35, SYM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Machinery industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CLH vs. SYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLH

4.56

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

CLH’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper tier for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SYM

108.69

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

At 108.69, SYM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Machinery industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CLH vs. SYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLHSYM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.44--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.2314.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.56108.69
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.8465.91