Seek Returns logo

CLH vs. PAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLH and PAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CLH is a standard domestic listing, while PAC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCLHPAC
Company NameClean Harbors, Inc.Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
CountryUnited StatesMexico
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesTransportation Infrastructure
Market Capitalization13.17 billion USD12.28 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 24, 1987February 27, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLH and PAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLH vs. PAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLHPAC
5-Day Price Return0.43%-4.05%
13-Week Price Return7.19%1.58%
26-Week Price Return12.66%8.22%
52-Week Price Return0.65%44.78%
Month-to-Date Return4.16%4.02%
Year-to-Date Return6.72%22.99%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.27M0.64M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.36M0.69M
3-Month Volatility17.93%21.02%
Beta1.211.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLH

14.82%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

CLH’s Return on Equity of 14.82% is on par with the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PAC

42.80%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
26.85%
Q3
15.47%
Median
10.39%
Q1
7.70%
Min
0.79%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 42.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CLH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLH

6.48%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

CLH’s Net Profit Margin of 6.48% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PAC

23.19%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
49.26%
Q3
27.75%
Median
17.98%
Q1
10.18%
Min
4.19%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 23.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CLH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLH

10.95%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

CLH’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.95% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PAC

42.29%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
60.91%
Q3
43.57%
Median
30.58%
Q1
16.77%
Min
1.18%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.29% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CLH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLHPAC
Return on Equity (TTM)14.82%42.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.24%11.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.48%23.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)10.95%42.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.76%100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLH

2.45

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

CLH’s Current Ratio of 2.45 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PAC

0.93

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
1.90
Median
1.35
Q1
0.86
Min
0.28

PAC’s Current Ratio of 0.93 aligns with the median group of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CLH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLH

1.02

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

CLH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.02 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PAC

2.48

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.70
Q3
1.70
Median
0.83
Q1
0.30
Min
0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.48. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CLH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLH

4.95

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

CLH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.95 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
29.26
Q3
20.33
Median
8.92
Q1
5.22
Min
2.01

In the lower quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CLH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLHPAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.450.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.970.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.022.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.955.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLH vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLH vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLH

0.00%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

CLH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PAC

2.53%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
7.48%
Q3
3.76%
Median
2.40%
Q1
1.13%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CLH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLH

0.00%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

CLH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PAC

71.16%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
197.82%
Q3
109.11%
Median
70.69%
Q1
33.40%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.16% is within the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CLH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLHPAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%71.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLH

34.14

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

CLH’s P/E Ratio of 34.14 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PAC

19.76

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
35.90
Q3
21.76
Median
17.41
Q1
12.31
Min
5.46

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 19.76 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CLH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLH

2.21

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

CLH’s P/S Ratio of 2.21 aligns with the market consensus for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PAC

4.58

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
10.76
Q3
5.52
Median
2.96
Q1
1.59
Min
0.84

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.58 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CLH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLH

4.56

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

CLH’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper tier for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PAC

9.90

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.46
Q3
2.80
Median
1.80
Q1
1.12
Min
0.37

At 9.90, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CLH vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLHPAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.1419.76
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.214.58
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.569.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.6118.23