Seek Returns logo

CLH vs. LUV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLH and LUV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLHLUV
Company NameClean Harbors, Inc.Southwest Airlines Co.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesPassenger Airlines
Market Capitalization13.43 billion USD16.27 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 24, 1987January 2, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLH and LUV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLH vs. LUV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLHLUV
5-Day Price Return3.44%4.77%
13-Week Price Return9.58%-0.96%
26-Week Price Return5.73%-0.39%
52-Week Price Return8.44%22.03%
Month-to-Date Return6.20%0.13%
Year-to-Date Return8.82%-7.88%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.44M9.27M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.40M12.50M
3-Month Volatility17.66%40.35%
Beta1.211.23

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLH

14.82%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

CLH’s Return on Equity of 14.82% is on par with the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LUV

4.11%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
49.96%
Q3
28.15%
Median
15.41%
Q1
8.29%
Min
-11.01%

LUV’s Return on Equity of 4.11% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CLH vs. LUV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLH

6.48%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

CLH’s Net Profit Margin of 6.48% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LUV

1.43%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
17.65%
Q3
8.90%
Median
5.80%
Q1
2.02%
Min
-3.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Net Profit Margin of 1.43% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CLH vs. LUV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLH

10.95%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

CLH’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.95% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LUV

1.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.47%
Q3
12.33%
Median
8.62%
Q1
4.43%
Min
-2.88%

LUV’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.15% is in the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CLH vs. LUV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLHLUV
Return on Equity (TTM)14.82%4.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.24%1.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.48%1.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)10.95%1.15%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.76%73.31%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLH

2.45

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

CLH’s Current Ratio of 2.45 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LUV

0.56

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.46
Q3
0.94
Median
0.76
Q1
0.54
Min
0.17

LUV’s Current Ratio of 0.56 aligns with the median group of the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CLH vs. LUV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLH

1.02

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

CLH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.02 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LUV

0.51

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
9.80
Q3
4.82
Median
1.30
Q1
0.89
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry, LUV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CLH vs. LUV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLH

4.95

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

CLH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.95 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LUV

9.27

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
22.60
Q3
16.29
Median
6.75
Q1
1.94
Min
-8.55

LUV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.27 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Passenger Airlines industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CLH vs. LUV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLHLUV
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.450.56
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.970.45
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.020.51
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.959.27

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLH vs. LUV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLH vs. LUV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLH

0.00%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

CLH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LUV

2.65%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
3.95%
Median
1.10%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Yield of 2.65% is consistent with its peers in the Passenger Airlines industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CLH vs. LUV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLH

0.00%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

CLH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LUV

59.15%

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
71.59%
Q3
38.54%
Median
8.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LUV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.15% is in the upper quartile for the Passenger Airlines industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CLH vs. LUV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLHLUV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%59.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLH

34.44

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

CLH’s P/E Ratio of 34.44 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LUV

41.16

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
13.29
Q3
11.94
Median
8.78
Q1
7.42
Min
3.07

At 41.16, LUV’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CLH vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLH

2.23

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

CLH’s P/S Ratio of 2.23 aligns with the market consensus for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LUV

0.59

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.74
Median
0.61
Q1
0.44
Min
0.09

LUV’s P/S Ratio of 0.59 aligns with the market consensus for the Passenger Airlines industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CLH vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLH

4.56

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

CLH’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper tier for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LUV

2.31

Passenger Airlines Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
2.89
Median
1.84
Q1
1.22
Min
0.56

LUV’s P/B Ratio of 2.31 is within the conventional range for the Passenger Airlines industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CLH vs. LUV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Passenger Airlines industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLHLUV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)34.4441.16
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.230.59
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.562.31
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.8443.02