Seek Returns logo

CLH vs. GPN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLH and GPN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLHGPN
Company NameClean Harbors, Inc.Global Payments Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsFinancials
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesFinancial Services
Market Capitalization12.23 billion USD20.65 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 24, 1987January 16, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLH and GPN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLH vs. GPN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLHGPN
5-Day Price Return-0.34%-4.63%
13-Week Price Return0.45%3.80%
26-Week Price Return16.45%-16.85%
52-Week Price Return-2.60%-17.76%
Month-to-Date Return-4.12%-6.46%
Year-to-Date Return0.90%-25.86%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.40M2.80M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.36M2.59M
3-Month Volatility19.55%35.96%
Beta1.180.97

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLH

14.82%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

CLH’s Return on Equity of 14.82% is on par with the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GPN

6.36%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

GPN’s Return on Equity of 6.36% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CLH vs. GPN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLH

6.48%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

CLH’s Net Profit Margin of 6.48% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GPN

15.07%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

GPN’s Net Profit Margin of 15.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CLH vs. GPN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLH

10.95%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

CLH’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.95% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GPN

23.26%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

GPN’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.26% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CLH vs. GPN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLHGPN
Return on Equity (TTM)14.82%6.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.24%2.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.48%15.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)10.95%23.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.76%65.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLH

2.45

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

CLH’s Current Ratio of 2.45 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GPN

0.95

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CLH vs. GPN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLH

1.02

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

CLH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.02 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GPN

0.74

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CLH vs. GPN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLH

4.95

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

CLH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.95 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GPN

5.15

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CLH vs. GPN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLHGPN
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.450.95
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.970.90
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.020.74
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.955.15

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLH vs. GPN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLH vs. GPN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLH

0.00%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

CLH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GPN

1.20%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Yield of 1.20% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CLH vs. GPN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLH

0.00%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

CLH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GPN

17.30%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.30% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CLH vs. GPN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLHGPN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.20%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%17.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLH

32.19

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

CLH’s P/E Ratio of 32.19 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GPN

14.42

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

GPN’s P/E Ratio of 14.42 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CLH vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLH

2.08

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

CLH’s P/S Ratio of 2.08 aligns with the market consensus for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GPN

2.17

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CLH vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLH

4.56

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

CLH’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper tier for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GPN

0.86

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

GPN’s P/B Ratio of 0.86 is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CLH vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Commercial Services & Supplies and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLHGPN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.1914.42
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.082.17
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.560.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.096.60