Seek Returns logo

CLF vs. HL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CLF and HL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLFHL
Company NameCleveland-Cliffs Inc.Hecla Mining Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningMetals & Mining
Market Capitalization6.31 billion USD7.97 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLF and HL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLF vs. HL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLFHL
5-Day Price Return-0.70%0.08%
13-Week Price Return44.56%96.05%
26-Week Price Return55.11%114.03%
52-Week Price Return-1.62%79.49%
Month-to-Date Return4.51%-1.65%
Year-to-Date Return35.64%142.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume26.31M23.24M
3-Month Avg. Volume28.46M24.48M
3-Month Volatility55.41%61.38%
Beta1.981.38

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLF

-26.06%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.55%
Q3
17.74%
Median
9.00%
Q1
1.65%
Min
-21.32%

CLF has a negative Return on Equity of -26.06%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

HL

4.74%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
41.55%
Q3
17.74%
Median
9.00%
Q1
1.65%
Min
-21.32%

HL’s Return on Equity of 4.74% is on par with the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CLF vs. HL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLF

-9.03%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
43.69%
Q3
19.12%
Median
6.48%
Q1
1.50%
Min
-20.21%

CLF has a negative Net Profit Margin of -9.03%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

HL

9.46%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
43.69%
Q3
19.12%
Median
6.48%
Q1
1.50%
Min
-20.21%

HL’s Net Profit Margin of 9.46% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CLF vs. HL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLF

-9.54%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
71.84%
Q3
32.31%
Median
12.50%
Q1
2.69%
Min
-23.81%

CLF has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -9.54%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

HL

19.50%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
71.84%
Q3
32.31%
Median
12.50%
Q1
2.69%
Min
-23.81%

HL’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.50% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CLF vs. HL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLFHL
Return on Equity (TTM)-26.06%4.74%
Return on Assets (TTM)-8.44%3.27%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-9.03%9.46%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-9.54%19.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-5.29%30.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLF

2.04

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.04
Median
1.96
Q1
1.42
Min
0.13

CLF’s Current Ratio of 2.04 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

HL

2.67

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.04
Median
1.96
Q1
1.42
Min
0.13

HL’s Current Ratio of 2.67 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CLF vs. HL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLF

1.33

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.51
Median
0.33
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.33, CLF operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Metals & Mining industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

HL

0.24

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.10
Q3
0.51
Median
0.33
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

HL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.24 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CLF vs. HL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLF

-1.55

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
22.73
Median
5.76
Q1
0.82
Min
-21.72

CLF has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.55. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

HL

2.47

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
51.62
Q3
22.73
Median
5.76
Q1
0.82
Min
-21.72

HL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.47 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CLF vs. HL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLFHL
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.042.67
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.611.99
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.330.24
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-1.552.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLF vs. HL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLF vs. HL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLF

0.00%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.57%
Median
1.25%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CLF currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HL

0.28%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
8.17%
Q3
3.57%
Median
1.25%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HL’s Dividend Yield of 0.28% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CLF vs. HL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLF

0.00%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
62.06%
Median
33.17%
Q1
10.41%
Min
0.00%

CLF has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HL

22.30%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
62.06%
Median
33.17%
Q1
10.41%
Min
0.00%

HL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.30% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CLF vs. HL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLFHL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.28%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%22.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLF

--

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
83.04
Q3
41.69
Median
20.30
Q1
12.95
Min
1.75

P/E Ratio data for CLF is currently unavailable.

HL

79.39

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
83.04
Q3
41.69
Median
20.30
Q1
12.95
Min
1.75

A P/E Ratio of 79.39 places HL in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CLF vs. HL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLF

0.34

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.28
Q3
4.28
Median
2.37
Q1
0.86
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CLF’s P/S Ratio of 0.34 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

HL

7.51

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.28
Q3
4.28
Median
2.37
Q1
0.86
Min
0.16

HL’s P/S Ratio of 7.51 is in the upper echelon for the Metals & Mining industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CLF vs. HL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLF

0.65

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.45
Median
1.55
Q1
0.94
Min
0.34

CLF’s P/B Ratio of 0.65 is in the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

HL

1.64

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.45
Median
1.55
Q1
0.94
Min
0.34

HL’s P/B Ratio of 1.64 is within the conventional range for the Metals & Mining industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CLF vs. HL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLFHL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--79.39
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.347.51
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.651.64
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)4.3572.07