CLF vs. CTVA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 4, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CLF and CTVA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	CLF	CTVA
Company Name	Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.	Corteva, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Materials	Materials
GICS Industry	Metals & Mining	Chemicals
Market Capitalization	6.15 billion USD	42.03 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	February 21, 1973	May 24, 2019
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLF and CTVA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLF vs. CTVA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CLF	CTVA
5-Day Price Return	4.01%	-2.84%
13-Week Price Return	60.53%	-9.26%
26-Week Price Return	33.48%	7.86%
52-Week Price Return	-4.39%	15.45%
Month-to-Date Return	13.49%	-8.84%
Year-to-Date Return	29.79%	18.73%
10-Day Avg. Volume	24.60M	5.31M
3-Month Avg. Volume	28.91M	4.27M
3-Month Volatility	58.45%	20.88%
Beta	2.08	0.83

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLF

-26.06%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 41.55%
Q3: 17.74%
Median: 9.00%
Q1: 1.65%
Min: -21.32%

CLF has a negative Return on Equity of -26.06%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CTVA

5.68%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 29.52%
Q3: 13.18%
Median: 6.53%
Q1: 1.35%
Min: -11.86%

CTVA’s Return on Equity of 5.68% is on par with the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CLF vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLF

-9.03%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 43.69%
Q3: 19.12%
Median: 6.48%
Q1: 1.50%
Min: -20.21%

CLF has a negative Net Profit Margin of -9.03%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CTVA

8.16%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 20.20%
Q3: 9.15%
Median: 3.94%
Q1: 0.60%
Min: -10.43%

CTVA’s Net Profit Margin of 8.16% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Chemicals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CLF vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLF

-9.54%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 71.84%
Q3: 32.31%
Median: 12.50%
Q1: 2.69%
Min: -23.81%

CLF has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -9.54%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CTVA

13.06%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 27.33%
Q3: 13.82%
Median: 7.98%
Q1: 3.60%
Min: -7.61%

CTVA’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.06% is around the midpoint for the Chemicals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CLF vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CLF	CTVA
Return on Equity (TTM)	-26.06%	5.68%
Return on Assets (TTM)	-8.44%	3.36%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	-9.03%	8.16%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	-9.54%	13.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	-5.29%	45.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLF

2.04

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 5.27
Q3: 3.04
Median: 1.96
Q1: 1.42
Min: 0.13

CLF’s Current Ratio of 2.04 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CTVA

1.68

Chemicals Industry

Max: 3.72
Q3: 2.38
Median: 1.69
Q1: 1.42
Min: 0.75

CTVA’s Current Ratio of 1.68 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CLF vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLF

1.33

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 1.10
Q3: 0.51
Median: 0.33
Q1: 0.09
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.33, CLF operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Metals & Mining industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CTVA

0.14

Chemicals Industry

Max: 1.53
Q3: 1.00
Median: 0.69
Q1: 0.41
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, CTVA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CLF vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLF

-1.55

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 51.62
Q3: 22.73
Median: 5.76
Q1: 0.82
Min: -21.72

CLF has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.55. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CTVA

4.45

Chemicals Industry

Max: 56.43
Q3: 26.33
Median: 8.84
Q1: 2.54
Min: -9.39

CTVA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.45 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CLF vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CLF	CTVA
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.04	1.68
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.61	1.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.33	0.14
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	-1.55	4.45

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLF vs. CTVA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLF vs. CTVA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLF

0.00%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 8.17%
Q3: 3.57%
Median: 1.25%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CLF currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CTVA

1.13%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 6.59%
Q3: 3.67%
Median: 2.44%
Q1: 1.36%
Min: 0.00%

CTVA’s Dividend Yield of 1.13% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CLF vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLF

0.00%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 138.08%
Q3: 62.06%
Median: 33.17%
Q1: 10.41%
Min: 0.00%

CLF has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CTVA

11.80%

Chemicals Industry

Max: 192.00%
Q3: 108.95%
Median: 57.38%
Q1: 27.28%
Min: 0.00%

CTVA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.80% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CLF vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CLF	CTVA
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	1.13%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	11.80%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLF

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 83.04
Q3: 41.69
Median: 20.30
Q1: 12.95
Min: 1.75

P/E Ratio data for CLF is currently unavailable.

CTVA

29.61

Chemicals Industry

Max: 49.43
Q3: 32.03
Median: 21.32
Q1: 14.93
Min: 8.66

CTVA’s P/E Ratio of 29.61 is within the middle range for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CLF vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLF

0.33

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 9.28
Q3: 4.28
Median: 2.37
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.16

In the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CLF’s P/S Ratio of 0.33 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CTVA

2.42

Chemicals Industry

Max: 3.90
Q3: 2.23
Median: 1.00
Q1: 0.55
Min: 0.15

CTVA’s P/S Ratio of 2.42 is in the upper echelon for the Chemicals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CLF vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLF

0.65

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 4.68
Q3: 2.45
Median: 1.55
Q1: 0.94
Min: 0.34

CLF’s P/B Ratio of 0.65 is in the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CTVA

1.96

Chemicals Industry

Max: 5.01
Q3: 2.59
Median: 1.50
Q1: 0.95
Min: 0.30

CTVA’s P/B Ratio of 1.96 is within the conventional range for the Chemicals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CLF vs. CTVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CLF	CTVA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	--	29.61
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.33	2.42
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	0.65	1.96
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	4.24	8.61