CLF vs. CRH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 19, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CLF and CRH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	CLF	CRH
Company Name	Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.	CRH plc
Country	United States	Ireland
GICS Sector	Materials	Materials
GICS Industry	Metals & Mining	Construction Materials
Market Capitalization	5.26 billion USD	76.39 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	February 21, 1973	July 13, 1989
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CLF and CRH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CLF vs. CRH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CLF	CRH
5-Day Price Return	12.85%	6.29%
13-Week Price Return	41.54%	15.11%
26-Week Price Return	-0.28%	8.04%
52-Week Price Return	-16.50%	38.77%
Month-to-Date Return	1.05%	19.07%
Year-to-Date Return	13.09%	22.84%
10-Day Avg. Volume	18.68M	5.42M
3-Month Avg. Volume	29.71M	4.74M
3-Month Volatility	81.45%	31.13%
Beta	1.96	1.34

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CLF

-26.06%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 31.09%
Q3: 16.14%
Median: 7.01%
Q1: 1.15%
Min: -19.85%

CLF has a negative Return on Equity of -26.06%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CRH

15.20%

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 24.78%
Q3: 14.96%
Median: 10.37%
Q1: 4.14%
Min: -2.94%

In the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry, CRH’s Return on Equity of 15.20% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CLF vs. CRH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CLF

-9.03%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 40.97%
Q3: 17.87%
Median: 7.03%
Q1: 1.82%
Min: -20.01%

CLF has a negative Net Profit Margin of -9.03%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CRH

9.09%

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 28.01%
Q3: 15.18%
Median: 9.09%
Q1: 3.32%
Min: -4.30%

CRH’s Net Profit Margin of 9.09% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction Materials industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CLF vs. CRH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CLF

-9.54%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 59.48%
Q3: 26.06%
Median: 10.50%
Q1: 2.89%
Min: -21.46%

CLF has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -9.54%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CRH

13.88%

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 31.67%
Q3: 18.49%
Median: 11.57%
Q1: 7.82%
Min: -1.44%

CRH’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.88% is around the midpoint for the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CLF vs. CRH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CLF	CRH
Return on Equity (TTM)	-26.06%	15.20%
Return on Assets (TTM)	-8.44%	6.36%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	-9.03%	9.09%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	-9.54%	13.88%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	-5.29%	35.99%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CLF

2.04

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 4.81
Q3: 2.86
Median: 1.94
Q1: 1.45
Min: 0.13

CLF’s Current Ratio of 2.04 aligns with the median group of the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRH

1.74

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 5.14
Q3: 2.89
Median: 1.92
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.79

CRH’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CLF vs. CRH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CLF

1.33

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 1.11
Q3: 0.52
Median: 0.29
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.33, CLF operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Metals & Mining industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CRH

0.71

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 0.99
Q3: 0.72
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.00

CRH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.71 is typical for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CLF vs. CRH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CLF

-1.55

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 65.47
Q3: 29.91
Median: 5.88
Q1: 0.91
Min: -26.49

CLF has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.55. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CRH

11.05

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 54.89
Q3: 34.04
Median: 7.92
Q1: 4.28
Min: -6.24

CRH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CLF vs. CRH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CLF	CRH
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.04	1.74
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.61	1.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.33	0.71
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	-1.55	11.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

CLF vs. CRH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CLF vs. CRH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CLF

0.00%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 9.36%
Q3: 3.78%
Median: 1.41%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CLF currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CRH

1.28%

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 5.91%
Q3: 4.64%
Median: 2.57%
Q1: 1.11%
Min: 0.00%

CRH’s Dividend Yield of 1.28% is consistent with its peers in the Construction Materials industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CLF vs. CRH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CLF

0.00%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 138.08%
Q3: 63.28%
Median: 38.78%
Q1: 12.84%
Min: 0.00%

CLF has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CRH

28.69%

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 174.17%
Q3: 91.80%
Median: 44.42%
Q1: 23.07%
Min: 0.00%

CRH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.69% is within the typical range for the Construction Materials industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CLF vs. CRH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CLF	CRH
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	1.28%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	28.69%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CLF

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 57.44
Q3: 32.87
Median: 18.04
Q1: 9.84
Min: 0.00

P/E Ratio data for CLF is currently unavailable.

CRH

23.07

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 49.05
Q3: 24.51
Median: 12.09
Q1: 7.70
Min: 4.06

CRH’s P/E Ratio of 23.07 is within the middle range for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CLF vs. CRH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CLF

0.28

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 6.52
Q3: 3.19
Median: 1.97
Q1: 0.59
Min: 0.14

In the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, CLF’s P/S Ratio of 0.28 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CRH

2.10

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 4.03
Q3: 2.26
Median: 1.31
Q1: 0.66
Min: 0.19

CRH’s P/S Ratio of 2.10 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CLF vs. CRH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CLF

0.65

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 3.92
Q3: 2.15
Median: 1.40
Q1: 0.84
Min: 0.25

CLF’s P/B Ratio of 0.65 is in the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CRH

2.77

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 3.19
Q3: 1.80
Median: 1.08
Q1: 0.72
Min: 0.11

CRH’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Construction Materials industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CLF vs. CRH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Construction Materials industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CLF	CRH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	--	23.07
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.28	2.10
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	0.65	2.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	3.56	21.84