Seek Returns logo

CL vs. STZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CL and STZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLSTZ
Company NameColgate-Palmolive CompanyConstellation Brands, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsBeverages
Market Capitalization68.25 billion USD28.30 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 2, 1973March 17, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CL and STZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CL vs. STZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLSTZ
5-Day Price Return-2.12%-2.69%
13-Week Price Return-8.63%-13.67%
26-Week Price Return-5.61%-8.79%
52-Week Price Return-19.64%-33.98%
Month-to-Date Return0.72%-3.92%
Year-to-Date Return-7.11%-27.38%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.56M2.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.15M2.04M
3-Month Volatility17.00%27.80%
Beta0.350.69

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CL

679.67%

Household Products Industry

Max
226.04%
Q3
106.83%
Median
17.55%
Q1
9.51%
Min
-8.31%

CL’s Return on Equity of 679.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

STZ

-5.93%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

STZ has a negative Return on Equity of -5.93%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CL

14.55%

Household Products Industry

Max
12.48%
Q3
10.54%
Median
9.15%
Q1
8.81%
Min
8.58%

CL’s Net Profit Margin of 14.55% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

STZ

-4.40%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

STZ has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.40%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CL

21.17%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.54%
Q3
16.06%
Median
13.28%
Q1
12.03%
Min
6.49%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

STZ

1.24%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

STZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.24% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLSTZ
Return on Equity (TTM)679.67%-5.93%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.38%-1.97%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.55%-4.40%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.17%1.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.57%51.67%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CL

0.89

Household Products Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.04
Median
1.21
Q1
0.76
Min
0.55

CL’s Current Ratio of 0.89 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

STZ

1.07

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

STZ’s Current Ratio of 1.07 aligns with the median group of the Beverages industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CL

12.48

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 12.48, CL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Household Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

STZ

1.59

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

STZ’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Beverages industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.59. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CL

20.49

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
13.94
Q1
9.41
Min
4.76

CL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

STZ

0.81

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

STZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.81 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

CL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLSTZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.891.07
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.570.51
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)12.481.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.490.81

Growth

Revenue Growth

CL vs. STZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CL vs. STZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CL

2.57%

Household Products Industry

Max
5.40%
Q3
3.85%
Median
2.82%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

CL’s Dividend Yield of 2.57% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

STZ

2.46%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

STZ’s Dividend Yield of 2.46% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CL

61.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
191.34%
Q3
102.63%
Median
70.63%
Q1
34.62%
Min
0.00%

CL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.95% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

STZ

32.23%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

STZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.23% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLSTZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.57%2.46%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)61.95%32.23%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CL

24.14

Household Products Industry

Max
33.84
Q3
22.61
Median
18.73
Q1
14.08
Min
13.61

A P/E Ratio of 24.14 places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

STZ

--

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

P/E Ratio data for STZ is currently unavailable.

CL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CL

3.51

Household Products Industry

Max
4.78
Q3
2.70
Median
1.93
Q1
1.27
Min
0.73

CL’s P/S Ratio of 3.51 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

STZ

2.94

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

STZ’s P/S Ratio of 2.94 is in the upper echelon for the Beverages industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CL

104.94

Household Products Industry

Max
14.28
Q3
14.28
Median
4.13
Q1
1.75
Min
1.42

At 104.94, CL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

STZ

4.24

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

STZ’s P/B Ratio of 4.24 is in the upper tier for the Beverages industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CL vs. STZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLSTZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.14--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.512.94
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)104.944.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.8314.31