Seek Returns logo

CL vs. PM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CL and PM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLPM
Company NameColgate-Palmolive CompanyPhilip Morris International Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsTobacco
Market Capitalization69.78 billion USD258.21 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 2, 1973March 17, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CL and PM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CL vs. PM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLPM
5-Day Price Return1.92%-1.36%
13-Week Price Return-3.14%0.64%
26-Week Price Return0.77%14.15%
52-Week Price Return-14.75%42.89%
Month-to-Date Return2.97%1.12%
Year-to-Date Return-5.03%37.83%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.71M5.70M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.30M6.12M
3-Month Volatility17.38%26.22%
Beta0.350.50

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CL

679.67%

Household Products Industry

Max
226.04%
Q3
106.83%
Median
17.55%
Q1
9.51%
Min
-8.31%

CL’s Return on Equity of 679.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PM

575.44%

Tobacco Industry

Max
49.48%
Q3
49.48%
Median
7.92%
Q1
5.28%
Min
4.04%

PM’s Return on Equity of 575.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CL vs. PM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CL

14.55%

Household Products Industry

Max
12.48%
Q3
10.54%
Median
9.15%
Q1
8.81%
Min
8.58%

CL’s Net Profit Margin of 14.55% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

PM

21.08%

Tobacco Industry

Max
21.36%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.05%
Q1
6.80%
Min
5.37%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.08% places PM in the upper quartile for the Tobacco industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CL vs. PM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CL

21.17%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.54%
Q3
16.06%
Median
13.28%
Q1
12.03%
Min
6.49%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PM

36.28%

Tobacco Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
12.68%
Median
11.00%
Q1
10.58%
Min
10.58%

PM’s Operating Profit Margin of 36.28% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CL vs. PM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLPM
Return on Equity (TTM)679.67%575.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.38%12.56%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.55%21.08%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.17%36.28%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.57%66.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CL

0.89

Household Products Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.04
Median
1.21
Q1
0.76
Min
0.55

CL’s Current Ratio of 0.89 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PM

0.83

Tobacco Industry

Max
3.20
Q3
1.83
Median
0.83
Q1
0.72
Min
0.57

PM’s Current Ratio of 0.83 aligns with the median group of the Tobacco industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CL vs. PM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CL

12.48

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 12.48, CL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Household Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PM

186.08

Tobacco Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
2.19
Median
0.74
Q1
0.26
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 186.08, PM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Tobacco industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CL vs. PM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CL

20.49

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
13.94
Q1
9.41
Min
4.76

CL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PM

11.67

Tobacco Industry

Max
36.48
Q3
28.54
Median
7.02
Q1
6.32
Min
-11.45

PM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.67 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Tobacco industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CL vs. PM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLPM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.890.83
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.570.83
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)12.48186.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.4911.67

Growth

Revenue Growth

CL vs. PM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CL vs. PM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CL

2.57%

Household Products Industry

Max
5.40%
Q3
3.85%
Median
2.82%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

CL’s Dividend Yield of 2.57% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PM

3.23%

Tobacco Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
6.06%
Median
5.48%
Q1
3.91%
Min
3.27%

PM’s Dividend Yield of 3.23% is below the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This indicates that shareholder returns are likely driven more by potential capital appreciation than by dividend income.

CL vs. PM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CL

61.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
191.34%
Q3
102.63%
Median
70.63%
Q1
34.62%
Min
0.00%

CL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.95% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PM

70.92%

Tobacco Industry

Max
77.64%
Q3
76.55%
Median
50.14%
Q1
47.08%
Min
42.39%

PM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 70.92% is within the typical range for the Tobacco industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CL vs. PM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLPM
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.57%3.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)61.95%70.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CL

24.08

Household Products Industry

Max
33.84
Q3
22.61
Median
18.73
Q1
14.08
Min
13.61

A P/E Ratio of 24.08 places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PM

31.39

Tobacco Industry

Max
42.16
Q3
36.45
Median
20.93
Q1
10.52
Min
9.15

PM’s P/E Ratio of 31.39 is within the middle range for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CL vs. PM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CL

3.50

Household Products Industry

Max
4.78
Q3
2.70
Median
1.93
Q1
1.27
Min
0.73

CL’s P/S Ratio of 3.50 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PM

6.62

Tobacco Industry

Max
10.48
Q3
5.39
Median
3.32
Q1
1.54
Min
0.59

PM’s P/S Ratio of 6.62 is in the upper echelon for the Tobacco industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CL vs. PM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CL

104.94

Household Products Industry

Max
14.28
Q3
14.28
Median
4.13
Q1
1.75
Min
1.42

At 104.94, CL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PM

1,368.86

Tobacco Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
4.76
Median
2.18
Q1
1.70
Min
1.06

At 1,368.86, PM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Tobacco industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CL vs. PM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLPM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.0831.39
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.506.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)104.941,368.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.7926.52