Seek Returns logo

CL vs. MNST: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CL and MNST, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLMNST
Company NameColgate-Palmolive CompanyMonster Beverage Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsBeverages
Market Capitalization69.78 billion USD62.64 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 2, 1973December 9, 1985
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CL and MNST by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CL vs. MNST: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLMNST
5-Day Price Return1.92%5.51%
13-Week Price Return-3.14%4.55%
26-Week Price Return0.77%38.55%
52-Week Price Return-14.75%39.79%
Month-to-Date Return2.97%9.19%
Year-to-Date Return-5.03%22.05%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.71M9.27M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.30M6.13M
3-Month Volatility17.38%23.43%
Beta0.350.54

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CL

679.67%

Household Products Industry

Max
226.04%
Q3
106.83%
Median
17.55%
Q1
9.51%
Min
-8.31%

CL’s Return on Equity of 679.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MNST

24.73%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

MNST’s Return on Equity of 24.73% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CL

14.55%

Household Products Industry

Max
12.48%
Q3
10.54%
Median
9.15%
Q1
8.81%
Min
8.58%

CL’s Net Profit Margin of 14.55% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MNST

20.54%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.54% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CL

21.17%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.54%
Q3
16.06%
Median
13.28%
Q1
12.03%
Min
6.49%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MNST

26.93%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.93% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLMNST
Return on Equity (TTM)679.67%24.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.38%19.23%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.55%20.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.17%26.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.57%55.18%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CL

0.89

Household Products Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.04
Median
1.21
Q1
0.76
Min
0.55

CL’s Current Ratio of 0.89 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MNST

3.52

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

MNST’s Current Ratio of 3.52 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Beverages industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CL

12.48

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 12.48, CL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Household Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MNST

0.00

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, MNST’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CL

20.49

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
13.94
Q1
9.41
Min
4.76

CL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MNST

123.81

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 123.81, MNST demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Beverages industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLMNST
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.893.52
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.572.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)12.480.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.49123.81

Growth

Revenue Growth

CL vs. MNST: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CL vs. MNST: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CL

2.57%

Household Products Industry

Max
5.40%
Q3
3.85%
Median
2.82%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

CL’s Dividend Yield of 2.57% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

MNST currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CL

61.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
191.34%
Q3
102.63%
Median
70.63%
Q1
34.62%
Min
0.00%

CL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.95% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

MNST has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLMNST
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.57%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)61.95%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CL

24.08

Household Products Industry

Max
33.84
Q3
22.61
Median
18.73
Q1
14.08
Min
13.61

A P/E Ratio of 24.08 places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MNST

39.63

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

A P/E Ratio of 39.63 places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CL

3.50

Household Products Industry

Max
4.78
Q3
2.70
Median
1.93
Q1
1.27
Min
0.73

CL’s P/S Ratio of 3.50 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MNST

8.14

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

With a P/S Ratio of 8.14, MNST trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CL

104.94

Household Products Industry

Max
14.28
Q3
14.28
Median
4.13
Q1
1.75
Min
1.42

At 104.94, CL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MNST

8.49

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

At 8.49, MNST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Beverages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CL vs. MNST: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLMNST
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.0839.63
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.508.14
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)104.948.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.7934.70