Seek Returns logo

CL vs. KDP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CL and KDP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLKDP
Company NameColgate-Palmolive CompanyKeurig Dr Pepper Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsBeverages
Market Capitalization63.86 billion USD34.78 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 2, 1973May 7, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CL and KDP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CL vs. KDP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLKDP
5-Day Price Return-1.47%-2.82%
13-Week Price Return-12.06%-22.84%
26-Week Price Return-13.14%-25.10%
52-Week Price Return-22.88%-31.83%
Month-to-Date Return-4.91%-12.31%
Year-to-Date Return-12.07%-20.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.18M20.06M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.14M14.45M
3-Month Volatility17.36%33.63%
Beta0.350.44

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CL

679.67%

Household Products Industry

Max
216.14%
Q3
106.01%
Median
19.09%
Q1
9.92%
Min
-6.34%

CL’s Return on Equity of 679.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

KDP

6.23%

Beverages Industry

Max
45.90%
Q3
22.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
6.35%
Min
-13.21%

KDP’s Return on Equity of 6.23% is in the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CL vs. KDP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CL

14.55%

Household Products Industry

Max
14.55%
Q3
12.50%
Median
8.91%
Q1
8.67%
Min
5.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.55% places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

KDP

9.75%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.38%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.43%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.65%

KDP’s Net Profit Margin of 9.75% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CL vs. KDP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CL

21.17%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.76%
Q3
16.17%
Median
13.11%
Q1
12.17%
Min
6.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

KDP

16.89%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
20.15%
Median
13.14%
Q1
10.74%
Min
1.24%

KDP’s Operating Profit Margin of 16.89% is around the midpoint for the Beverages industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CL vs. KDP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLKDP
Return on Equity (TTM)679.67%6.23%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.38%2.87%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.55%9.75%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.17%16.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.57%54.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CL

0.89

Household Products Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.96
Median
1.21
Q1
0.79
Min
0.50

CL’s Current Ratio of 0.89 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

KDP

0.64

Beverages Industry

Max
3.52
Q3
2.00
Median
1.22
Q1
0.87
Min
0.55

KDP’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CL vs. KDP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CL

12.48

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.58
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 12.48, CL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Household Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

KDP

0.67

Beverages Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.74
Q1
0.37
Min
0.00

KDP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Beverages industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CL vs. KDP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CL

20.49

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
17.04
Q1
9.99
Min
5.60

CL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KDP

3.60

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
42.68
Median
10.96
Q1
3.86
Min
0.81

In the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, KDP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.60 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CL vs. KDP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLKDP
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.890.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.570.33
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)12.480.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.493.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

CL vs. KDP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CL vs. KDP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CL

2.82%

Household Products Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.95%
Median
2.83%
Q1
2.02%
Min
1.34%

CL’s Dividend Yield of 2.82% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KDP

3.52%

Beverages Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
4.37%
Median
3.32%
Q1
1.98%
Min
0.00%

KDP’s Dividend Yield of 3.52% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CL vs. KDP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CL

61.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
187.99%
Q3
110.64%
Median
74.63%
Q1
58.31%
Min
30.76%

CL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.95% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

KDP

54.58%

Beverages Industry

Max
188.65%
Q3
104.55%
Median
72.60%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

KDP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 54.58% is within the typical range for the Beverages industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CL vs. KDP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLKDP
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.82%3.52%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)61.95%54.58%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CL

21.96

Household Products Industry

Max
30.25
Q3
22.11
Median
20.35
Q1
15.19
Min
13.52

CL’s P/E Ratio of 21.96 is within the middle range for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KDP

22.74

Beverages Industry

Max
35.25
Q3
22.66
Median
17.17
Q1
13.65
Min
4.77

A P/E Ratio of 22.74 places KDP in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CL vs. KDP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CL

3.19

Household Products Industry

Max
4.23
Q3
2.58
Median
1.98
Q1
1.29
Min
1.03

CL’s P/S Ratio of 3.19 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

KDP

2.22

Beverages Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.24
Median
1.34
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

KDP’s P/S Ratio of 2.22 aligns with the market consensus for the Beverages industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CL vs. KDP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CL

104.94

Household Products Industry

Max
46.10
Q3
21.55
Median
5.33
Q1
2.16
Min
1.41

At 104.94, CL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

KDP

1.80

Beverages Industry

Max
6.90
Q3
4.23
Median
2.20
Q1
1.51
Min
0.69

KDP’s P/B Ratio of 1.80 is within the conventional range for the Beverages industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CL vs. KDP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Beverages industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLKDP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.9622.74
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.192.22
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)104.941.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.9622.18