Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Haleon (HLN)

Company Profile

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) and Haleon (HLN) both fall under the Household & Personal Products industry group, but CL is classified in Household Products while HLN is classified in Personal Care Products.

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) has more than two decades of public-market history since May 2, 1973, whereas Haleon (HLN) listed on July 25, 2022 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) trades as a standard ordinary-equity line, while Haleon (HLN) is an ADR tied to a foreign-share or depositary-receipt structure — compare with FX exposure, program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Historical Performance

Historical Performance at a Glance

Profitability

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) posts Return on Equity (TTM) of 475.13%, above its industry benchmark range, while Haleon (HLN) at 10.30% sits closer to the industry mid-range.

Haleon (HLN) at 15.11% ranks in the top quartile for Net Profit Margin (TTM), ahead of Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 10.04%, which sits closer to the industry mid-range.

Haleon (HLN) at 21.87% ranks in the top quartile for Operating Profit Margin (TTM), ahead of Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 15.42%, which sits closer to the industry mid-range.

Profitability at a Glance

Financial Strength

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 1.02 keeps Current Ratio (MRQ) within its industry mid-range, while Haleon (HLN) at 0.92 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for HLN.

Haleon (HLN) at 0.52 is around its industry mid-range for Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ), while Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 54.99 sits above its industry benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 18.78 ranks in the top quartile for Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM), ahead of Haleon (HLN) at 8.29, which sits around the industry mid-range.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Growth

Revenue Growth

Revenue Growth at a Glance

EPS Growth

EPS Growth at a Glance

Dividend

Both Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 2.54% and Haleon (HLN) at 2.05% report Dividend Yield (TTM) near their industry mid-ranges, so neither company stands out strongly from peers on cash yield relative to share price.

Haleon (HLN) at 36.71% maintains Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) around its industry median — a balanced dividend policy. Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 61.72% sits outside the typical mid-range, leaning toward more retention or more distribution than the industry median.

Dividend at a Glance

Valuation

Haleon (HLN) at 17.91 carries typical industry Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM), while Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 34.60 sits in the higher-multiple quartile — CL carries a higher trailing earnings multiple relative to peers.

Both Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 3.47 and Haleon (HLN) at 2.71 trade in the higher-multiple quartile for Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) among industry peers, indicating higher trailing revenue multiples than typical peers.

Haleon (HLN) at 2.03 hovers around the typical industry Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ), while Colgate-Palmolive (CL) at 471.59 sits above its industry benchmark range — an elevated book-value multiple for CL relative to peers.

Valuation at a Glance