Seek Returns logo

CIG vs. SBS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CIG and SBS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both CIG and SBS are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolCIGSBS
Company NameCompanhia Energética de Minas Gerais - CEMIGCompanhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP
CountryBrazilBrazil
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryElectric UtilitiesWater Utilities
Market Capitalization6.24 billion USD15.10 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 18, 1996May 10, 2002
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CIG and SBS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CIG vs. SBS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCIGSBS
5-Day Price Return1.02%-0.42%
13-Week Price Return1.68%1.60%
26-Week Price Return-4.39%17.06%
52-Week Price Return-8.57%19.43%
Month-to-Date Return5.32%9.81%
Year-to-Date Return-2.07%34.38%
10-Day Avg. Volume11.70M3.15M
3-Month Avg. Volume12.00M3.07M
3-Month Volatility23.52%30.65%
Beta0.650.08

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CIG

25.46%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
23.82%
Q3
14.31%
Median
10.58%
Q1
7.57%
Min
1.03%

CIG’s Return on Equity of 25.46% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electric Utilities industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SBS

28.24%

Water Utilities Industry

Max
14.76%
Q3
13.44%
Median
10.08%
Q1
6.84%
Min
5.11%

SBS’s Return on Equity of 28.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Water Utilities industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CIG vs. SBS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CIG

10.43%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
29.46%
Q3
17.23%
Median
11.43%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-2.53%

CIG’s Net Profit Margin of 10.43% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SBS

33.53%

Water Utilities Industry

Max
33.53%
Q3
23.04%
Median
13.50%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-3.68%

A Net Profit Margin of 33.53% places SBS in the upper quartile for the Water Utilities industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CIG vs. SBS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CIG

13.14%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
46.44%
Q3
26.51%
Median
19.26%
Q1
11.77%
Min
2.81%

CIG’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.14% is around the midpoint for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SBS

54.67%

Water Utilities Industry

Max
54.67%
Q3
39.13%
Median
31.40%
Q1
24.32%
Min
7.04%

An Operating Profit Margin of 54.67% places SBS in the upper quartile for the Water Utilities industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CIG vs. SBS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCIGSBS
Return on Equity (TTM)25.46%28.24%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.51%13.32%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.43%33.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.14%54.67%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)26.73%16.67%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CIG

1.06

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
1.22
Median
0.99
Q1
0.78
Min
0.34

CIG’s Current Ratio of 1.06 aligns with the median group of the Electric Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SBS

1.09

Water Utilities Industry

Max
1.94
Q3
1.40
Median
1.09
Q1
0.77
Min
0.38

SBS’s Current Ratio of 1.09 aligns with the median group of the Water Utilities industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CIG vs. SBS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CIG

0.56

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
3.40
Q3
1.83
Median
1.32
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, CIG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SBS

0.72

Water Utilities Industry

Max
5.48
Q3
3.71
Median
1.82
Q1
0.96
Min
0.58

Falling into the lower quartile for the Water Utilities industry, SBS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CIG vs. SBS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CIG

5.72

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
18.68
Q3
10.64
Median
3.32
Q1
2.62
Min
-3.31

CIG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.72 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electric Utilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SBS

17.26

Water Utilities Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
4.65
Median
3.25
Q1
2.23
Min
0.58

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.26, SBS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Water Utilities industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CIG vs. SBS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCIGSBS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.061.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.061.08
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.560.72
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.7217.26

Growth

Revenue Growth

CIG vs. SBS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CIG vs. SBS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CIG

12.54%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
7.00%
Q3
4.67%
Median
3.84%
Q1
2.48%
Min
0.00%

CIG’s Dividend Yield of 12.54% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Electric Utilities industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

SBS

1.18%

Water Utilities Industry

Max
5.64%
Q3
5.51%
Median
4.50%
Q1
2.37%
Min
0.00%

SBS’s Dividend Yield of 1.18% is in the lower quartile for the Water Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CIG vs. SBS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CIG

71.99%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
150.16%
Q3
88.91%
Median
65.69%
Q1
34.65%
Min
0.00%

CIG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.99% is within the typical range for the Electric Utilities industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SBS

12.69%

Water Utilities Industry

Max
324.59%
Q3
254.46%
Median
142.60%
Q1
57.04%
Min
12.69%

SBS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 12.69% is in the lower quartile for the Water Utilities industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CIG vs. SBS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCIGSBS
Dividend Yield (TTM)12.54%1.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)71.99%12.69%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CIG

4.89

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
39.85
Q3
21.79
Median
15.62
Q1
8.97
Min
3.03

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, CIG’s P/E Ratio of 4.89 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SBS

7.69

Water Utilities Industry

Max
34.48
Q3
27.82
Median
18.45
Q1
14.12
Min
7.14

In the lower quartile for the Water Utilities industry, SBS’s P/E Ratio of 7.69 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CIG vs. SBS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CIG

0.89

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
5.96
Q3
3.09
Median
1.93
Q1
1.14
Min
0.15

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, CIG’s P/S Ratio of 0.89 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

SBS

2.58

Water Utilities Industry

Max
5.86
Q3
3.76
Median
2.73
Q1
2.16
Min
1.04

SBS’s P/S Ratio of 2.58 aligns with the market consensus for the Water Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CIG vs. SBS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CIG

1.21

Electric Utilities Industry

Max
2.99
Q3
1.99
Median
1.46
Q1
1.11
Min
0.18

CIG’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Electric Utilities industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SBS

1.82

Water Utilities Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
3.24
Median
1.73
Q1
1.09
Min
0.65

SBS’s P/B Ratio of 1.82 is within the conventional range for the Water Utilities industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CIG vs. SBS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electric Utilities and Water Utilities industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCIGSBS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)4.897.69
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.892.58
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.211.82
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.8439.10