Seek Returns logo

CIEN vs. SONY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CIEN and SONY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CIEN is a standard domestic listing, while SONY trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCIENSONY
Company NameCiena CorporationSony Group Corporation
CountryUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization13.38 billion USD167.68 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 7, 1997February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CIEN and SONY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CIEN vs. SONY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCIENSONY
5-Day Price Return-0.55%10.03%
13-Week Price Return19.81%11.14%
26-Week Price Return1.65%16.05%
52-Week Price Return95.18%13.72%
Month-to-Date Return1.96%8.42%
Year-to-Date Return11.61%18.49%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.61M16.17M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.05M15.29M
3-Month Volatility40.51%30.35%
Beta1.070.28

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CIEN

3.72%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

CIEN’s Return on Equity of 3.72% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SONY

14.17%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

SONY’s Return on Equity of 14.17% is on par with the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CIEN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CIEN

2.46%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

CIEN’s Net Profit Margin of 2.46% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SONY

9.13%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.13% places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CIEN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CIEN

4.66%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

CIEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.66% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SONY

11.68%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

SONY’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.68% is around the midpoint for the Household Durables industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CIEN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCIENSONY
Return on Equity (TTM)3.72%14.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.87%3.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.46%9.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.66%11.68%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.94%31.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

3.40

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

CIEN’s Current Ratio of 3.40 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

SONY

1.09

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

SONY’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Durables industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CIEN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

0.55

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

CIEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.55 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SONY

0.19

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

SONY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.19 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CIEN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

3.65

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

In the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, CIEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.65 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SONY

104.18

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SONY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 104.18 is in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CIEN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCIENSONY
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.401.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.271.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.550.19
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.65104.18

Growth

Revenue Growth

CIEN vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CIEN vs. SONY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CIEN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SONY

0.49%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Yield of 0.49% is consistent with its peers in the Household Durables industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CIEN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CIEN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SONY

10.52%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

SONY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.52% is within the typical range for the Household Durables industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CIEN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCIENSONY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.49%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%10.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

131.48

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

At 131.48, CIEN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SONY

21.27

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 21.27 places SONY in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CIEN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

3.23

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

CIEN’s P/S Ratio of 3.23 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SONY

1.94

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

SONY’s P/S Ratio of 1.94 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CIEN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

3.73

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

CIEN’s P/B Ratio of 3.73 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SONY

2.77

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

SONY’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Household Durables industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CIEN vs. SONY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCIENSONY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)131.4821.27
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.231.94
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.732.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.2612.12