Seek Returns logo

CIEN vs. RBLX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CIEN and RBLX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCIENRBLX
Company NameCiena CorporationRoblox Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentEntertainment
Market Capitalization21.44 billion USD93.63 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 7, 1997March 10, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CIEN and RBLX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CIEN vs. RBLX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCIENRBLX
5-Day Price Return5.24%4.05%
13-Week Price Return79.11%31.67%
26-Week Price Return121.52%129.49%
52-Week Price Return135.67%213.54%
Month-to-Date Return55.02%11.18%
Year-to-Date Return71.76%139.41%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.72M7.33M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.44M8.52M
3-Month Volatility56.30%50.92%
Beta1.151.63

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CIEN

5.04%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
20.90%
Median
9.10%
Q1
4.29%
Min
-13.50%

CIEN’s Return on Equity of 5.04% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RBLX

-354.27%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
24.06%
Median
13.69%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-17.95%

RBLX has a negative Return on Equity of -354.27%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CIEN vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CIEN

3.10%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
12.56%
Median
5.62%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-3.09%

CIEN’s Net Profit Margin of 3.10% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RBLX

-23.67%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
24.40%
Median
13.94%
Q1
4.28%
Min
-23.67%

RBLX has a negative Net Profit Margin of -23.67%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CIEN vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CIEN

5.41%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
25.23%
Q3
13.72%
Median
6.44%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-10.95%

CIEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.41% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RBLX

-27.35%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.77%
Q3
28.26%
Median
16.13%
Q1
8.03%
Min
-3.93%

RBLX has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -27.35%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CIEN vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCIENRBLX
Return on Equity (TTM)5.04%-354.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.49%-13.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.10%-23.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.41%-27.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.57%78.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

3.28

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
2.13
Median
1.55
Q1
1.15
Min
0.91

CIEN’s Current Ratio of 3.28 is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

RBLX

0.97

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.02
Median
1.55
Q1
0.86
Min
0.38

RBLX’s Current Ratio of 0.97 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CIEN vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

0.55

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.86
Median
0.53
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

CIEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.55 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RBLX

2.85

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.77
Median
0.16
Q1
0.02
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.85, RBLX operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Entertainment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CIEN vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

3.65

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
7.59
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

In the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, CIEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.65 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

RBLX

-845.00

Entertainment Industry

Max
87.17
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

RBLX has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -845.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CIEN vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCIENRBLX
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.280.97
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.280.96
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.552.85
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.65-845.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

CIEN vs. RBLX: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CIEN vs. RBLX: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
8.13%
Q3
3.29%
Median
0.94%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CIEN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RBLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.90%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.59%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CIEN vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
70.91%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CIEN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RBLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
38.45%
Median
29.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CIEN vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCIENRBLX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

145.62

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
103.74
Q3
61.65
Median
26.20
Q1
18.12
Min
4.19

At 145.62, CIEN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

RBLX

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
92.09
Q3
54.51
Median
28.92
Q1
19.75
Min
2.96

P/E Ratio data for RBLX is currently unavailable.

CIEN vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

4.52

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.86
Q3
6.24
Median
2.44
Q1
1.02
Min
0.48

CIEN’s P/S Ratio of 4.52 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RBLX

23.10

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.67
Median
5.06
Q1
2.72
Min
0.67

With a P/S Ratio of 23.10, RBLX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Entertainment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CIEN vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

4.70

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.28
Q3
5.73
Median
3.32
Q1
2.02
Min
0.42

CIEN’s P/B Ratio of 4.70 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RBLX

202.01

Entertainment Industry

Max
22.84
Q3
10.54
Median
6.60
Q1
2.30
Min
0.65

At 202.01, RBLX’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CIEN vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCIENRBLX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)145.62--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.5223.10
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.70202.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)33.8898.68