Seek Returns logo

CIEN vs. QXO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CIEN and QXO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCIENQXO
Company NameCiena CorporationQXO, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentTrading Companies & Distributors
Market Capitalization27.29 billion USD11.71 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 7, 1997April 17, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CIEN and QXO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CIEN vs. QXO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCIENQXO
5-Day Price Return-8.16%-10.83%
13-Week Price Return110.97%-17.79%
26-Week Price Return137.88%5.74%
52-Week Price Return168.50%11.36%
Month-to-Date Return0.94%-4.02%
Year-to-Date Return126.05%6.67%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.17M8.71M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.47M7.70M
3-Month Volatility61.30%50.10%
Beta1.152.35

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CIEN

5.04%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
31.28%
Q3
24.67%
Median
13.12%
Q1
4.60%
Min
-12.73%

CIEN’s Return on Equity of 5.04% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

QXO

-2.38%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.99%
Q3
19.30%
Median
12.90%
Q1
9.19%
Min
-4.19%

QXO has a negative Return on Equity of -2.38%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CIEN vs. QXO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CIEN

3.10%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
28.72%
Q3
14.02%
Median
5.41%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-13.11%

CIEN’s Net Profit Margin of 3.10% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

QXO

-3.81%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
18.35%
Q3
9.73%
Median
6.00%
Q1
3.53%
Min
-3.81%

QXO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -3.81%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CIEN vs. QXO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CIEN

5.41%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
33.69%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.02%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-4.94%

CIEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.41% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

QXO

-5.46%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
25.07%
Q3
13.61%
Median
7.26%
Q1
4.79%
Min
-7.51%

QXO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.46%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CIEN vs. QXO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCIENQXO
Return on Equity (TTM)5.04%-2.38%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.49%-1.62%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.10%-3.81%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)5.41%-5.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.57%22.49%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

3.28

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.28
Q3
2.10
Median
1.52
Q1
1.17
Min
0.91

CIEN’s Current Ratio of 3.28 is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

QXO

3.06

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
3.62
Q3
2.33
Median
1.57
Q1
1.39
Min
0.27

QXO’s Current Ratio of 3.06 is in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CIEN vs. QXO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

0.55

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.96
Median
0.43
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

CIEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.55 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

QXO

0.33

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.93
Q3
1.19
Median
0.78
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, QXO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CIEN vs. QXO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

3.65

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
8.92
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

In the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, CIEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.65 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

QXO

-23.41

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.62
Q1
1.79
Min
-1.67

QXO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -23.41. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CIEN vs. QXO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCIENQXO
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.283.06
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.282.20
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.550.33
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.65-23.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

CIEN vs. QXO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CIEN vs. QXO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
2.99%
Q3
2.30%
Median
0.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CIEN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

QXO

0.83%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
5.11%
Q3
2.73%
Median
2.07%
Q1
1.04%
Min
0.00%

QXO’s Dividend Yield of 0.83% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CIEN vs. QXO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
61.16%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CIEN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

QXO

0.00%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
136.12%
Q3
68.26%
Median
48.45%
Q1
22.66%
Min
0.00%

QXO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CIEN vs. QXO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCIENQXO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.83%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

191.95

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
74.67
Q3
56.42
Median
31.00
Q1
15.93
Min
3.89

At 191.95, CIEN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

QXO

--

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
37.92
Q3
24.64
Median
17.42
Q1
14.27
Min
5.07

P/E Ratio data for QXO is currently unavailable.

CIEN vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

5.95

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.84
Q3
5.68
Median
2.55
Q1
1.24
Min
0.40

CIEN’s P/S Ratio of 5.95 is in the upper echelon for the Communications Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

QXO

2.49

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.94
Q3
2.49
Median
1.08
Q1
0.75
Min
0.30

QXO’s P/S Ratio of 2.49 aligns with the market consensus for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CIEN vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

4.70

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.02
Q3
6.01
Median
3.83
Q1
2.41
Min
0.42

CIEN’s P/B Ratio of 4.70 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

QXO

1.31

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
9.42
Q3
4.66
Median
2.10
Q1
1.34
Min
0.31

QXO’s P/B Ratio of 1.31 is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CIEN vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCIENQXO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)191.95--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.952.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.701.31
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)44.6642.69