CIEN vs. NTES: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 22, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CIEN and NTES, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CIEN is a standard domestic listing, while NTES trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	CIEN	NTES
Company Name	Ciena Corporation	NetEase, Inc.
Country	United States	China
GICS Sector	Information Technology	Communication Services
GICS Industry	Communications Equipment	Entertainment
Market Capitalization	12.25 billion USD	83.01 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	February 7, 1997	June 30, 2000
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CIEN and NTES by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CIEN vs. NTES: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CIEN	NTES
5-Day Price Return	-5.23%	0.66%
13-Week Price Return	6.98%	9.59%
26-Week Price Return	-2.49%	24.53%
52-Week Price Return	60.62%	41.03%
Month-to-Date Return	-6.68%	0.17%
Year-to-Date Return	2.16%	46.31%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.63M	1.03M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.96M	1.02M
3-Month Volatility	40.43%	24.86%
Beta	1.07	0.66

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CIEN

3.72%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 32.05%
Q3: 19.58%
Median: 11.77%
Q1: 2.23%
Min: -11.93%

CIEN’s Return on Equity of 3.72% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NTES

24.25%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 42.50%
Q3: 22.75%
Median: 12.88%
Q1: 7.15%
Min: -6.84%

In the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s Return on Equity of 24.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CIEN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CIEN

2.46%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 23.65%
Q3: 14.32%
Median: 5.31%
Q1: 1.45%
Min: -12.72%

CIEN’s Net Profit Margin of 2.46% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NTES

31.19%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 45.25%
Q3: 23.93%
Median: 14.60%
Q1: 4.89%
Min: -22.94%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.19% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CIEN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CIEN

4.67%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 42.27%
Q3: 18.90%
Median: 6.21%
Q1: 2.97%
Min: -20.72%

CIEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.67% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NTES

31.43%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 46.83%
Q3: 28.87%
Median: 15.26%
Q1: 8.95%
Min: -5.53%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.43% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CIEN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CIEN	NTES
Return on Equity (TTM)	3.72%	24.25%
Return on Assets (TTM)	1.87%	17.31%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	2.46%	31.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	4.67%	31.43%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	41.94%	63.17%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

3.40

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 1.72
Q3: 1.72
Median: 1.46
Q1: 1.18
Min: 0.93

CIEN’s Current Ratio of 3.40 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

NTES

3.23

Entertainment Industry

Max: 6.80
Q3: 3.77
Median: 1.87
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.39

NTES’s Current Ratio of 3.23 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CIEN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

0.55

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 1.55
Q3: 0.92
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.00

CIEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.55 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NTES

0.08

Entertainment Industry

Max: 1.65
Q3: 0.71
Median: 0.14
Q1: 0.04
Min: 0.00

NTES’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CIEN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

3.66

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 181.73
Q3: 113.63
Median: 7.59
Q1: 3.82
Min: -5.39

In the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, CIEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.66 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

NTES

161.13

Entertainment Industry

Max: 62.11
Q3: 31.19
Median: 7.50
Q1: 2.02
Min: -6.33

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 161.13, NTES demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CIEN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CIEN	NTES
Current Ratio (MRQ)	3.40	3.23
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	2.27	3.10
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.55	0.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	3.66	161.13

Growth

Revenue Growth

CIEN vs. NTES: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CIEN vs. NTES: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 3.88%
Q3: 2.75%
Median: 0.93%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CIEN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NTES

2.18%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 2.54%
Q3: 1.29%
Median: 0.61%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.18%, NTES offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Entertainment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CIEN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 111.16%
Q3: 55.91%
Median: 28.42%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CIEN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NTES

36.90%

Entertainment Industry

Max: 82.30%
Q3: 45.76%
Median: 29.16%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

NTES’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.90% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CIEN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CIEN	NTES
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	2.18%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	36.90%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

118.08

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 57.30
Q3: 47.92
Median: 27.50
Q1: 17.89
Min: 13.89

At 118.08, CIEN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

NTES

16.94

Entertainment Industry

Max: 53.51
Q3: 45.31
Median: 33.16
Q1: 18.21
Min: 3.89

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s P/E Ratio of 16.94 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CIEN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

2.91

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 11.03
Q3: 5.53
Median: 2.20
Q1: 0.99
Min: 0.40

CIEN’s P/S Ratio of 2.91 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NTES

5.28

Entertainment Industry

Max: 12.81
Q3: 7.20
Median: 4.68
Q1: 3.32
Min: 0.79

NTES’s P/S Ratio of 5.28 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CIEN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

3.73

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.60
Median: 3.73
Q1: 2.67
Min: 0.30

CIEN’s P/B Ratio of 3.73 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NTES

4.09

Entertainment Industry

Max: 17.11
Q3: 8.38
Median: 5.24
Q1: 2.18
Min: 0.67

NTES’s P/B Ratio of 4.09 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CIEN vs. NTES: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CIEN	NTES
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	118.08	16.94
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.91	5.28
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	3.73	4.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	26.32	13.09