Seek Returns logo

CIEN vs. KSPI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CIEN and KSPI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CIEN is a standard domestic listing, while KSPI trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCIENKSPI
Company NameCiena CorporationJoint Stock Company Kaspi.kz
CountryUnited StatesKazakhstan
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentConsumer Finance
Market Capitalization12.25 billion USD17.23 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 7, 1997January 19, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CIEN and KSPI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CIEN vs. KSPI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCIENKSPI
5-Day Price Return-5.23%-5.84%
13-Week Price Return6.98%5.61%
26-Week Price Return-2.49%-17.32%
52-Week Price Return60.62%-29.51%
Month-to-Date Return-6.68%14.46%
Year-to-Date Return2.16%-4.65%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.63M0.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.96M0.30M
3-Month Volatility40.43%42.48%
Beta1.070.88

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CIEN

3.72%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

CIEN’s Return on Equity of 3.72% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KSPI

74.52%

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
32.87%
Q3
20.39%
Median
14.14%
Q1
7.64%
Min
-10.63%

KSPI’s Return on Equity of 74.52% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Consumer Finance industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CIEN vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CIEN

2.46%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

CIEN’s Net Profit Margin of 2.46% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
19.68%
Q3
15.94%
Median
13.37%
Q1
9.73%
Min
3.66%

Net Profit Margin data for KSPI is currently unavailable.

CIEN vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CIEN

4.67%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

CIEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.67% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
50.11%
Q3
29.38%
Median
18.31%
Q1
14.26%
Min
-5.45%

Operating Profit Margin data for KSPI is currently unavailable.

CIEN vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCIENKSPI
Return on Equity (TTM)3.72%74.52%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.87%13.24%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.46%--
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.67%--
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.94%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

3.40

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

CIEN’s Current Ratio of 3.40 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
5.34
Q3
4.21
Median
2.67
Q1
0.71
Min
0.20

For the Consumer Finance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CIEN vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

0.55

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

CIEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.55 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

KSPI

0.23

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
6.63
Q3
3.39
Median
2.21
Q1
0.94
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Consumer Finance industry.

CIEN vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

3.66

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

In the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, CIEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.66 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
49.63
Q3
39.33
Median
4.56
Q1
2.97
Min
-15.69

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Consumer Finance industry.

CIEN vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCIENKSPI
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.40--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.27--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.550.23
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.66--

Growth

Revenue Growth

CIEN vs. KSPI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CIEN vs. KSPI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CIEN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KSPI

6.73%

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
8.31%
Q3
3.93%
Median
2.51%
Q1
0.84%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.73%, KSPI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Consumer Finance industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CIEN vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CIEN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KSPI

78.77%

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
145.89%
Q3
88.53%
Median
23.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KSPI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 78.77% is within the typical range for the Consumer Finance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CIEN vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCIENKSPI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%6.73%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%78.77%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

118.08

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

At 118.08, CIEN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

KSPI

8.93

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
34.39
Q3
20.36
Median
13.05
Q1
9.29
Min
4.74

In the lower quartile for the Consumer Finance industry, KSPI’s P/E Ratio of 8.93 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CIEN vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

2.91

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

CIEN’s P/S Ratio of 2.91 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KSPI

--

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
4.28
Q3
2.67
Median
1.88
Q1
1.15
Min
0.55

P/S Ratio data for KSPI is currently unavailable.

CIEN vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

3.73

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

CIEN’s P/B Ratio of 3.73 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KSPI

5.70

Consumer Finance Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.40
Median
1.96
Q1
1.16
Min
0.26

At 5.70, KSPI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Consumer Finance industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CIEN vs. KSPI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Consumer Finance industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCIENKSPI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)118.088.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.91--
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.735.70
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.3214.23