Seek Returns logo

CIEN vs. GDS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CIEN and GDS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CIEN is a standard domestic listing, while GDS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCIENGDS
Company NameCiena CorporationGDS Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentIT Services
Market Capitalization13.38 billion USD6.88 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGM
Listing DateFebruary 7, 1997November 2, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CIEN and GDS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CIEN vs. GDS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCIENGDS
5-Day Price Return-0.55%-1.84%
13-Week Price Return19.81%29.01%
26-Week Price Return1.65%42.30%
52-Week Price Return95.18%-19.97%
Month-to-Date Return1.96%-0.79%
Year-to-Date Return11.61%54.47%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.61M6.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.05M8.73M
3-Month Volatility40.51%60.94%
Beta1.071.56

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CIEN

3.72%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

CIEN’s Return on Equity of 3.72% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GDS

19.12%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s Return on Equity of 19.12% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CIEN vs. GDS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CIEN

2.46%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

CIEN’s Net Profit Margin of 2.46% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GDS

41.75%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

GDS’s Net Profit Margin of 41.75% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the IT Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CIEN vs. GDS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CIEN

4.66%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

CIEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.66% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GDS

21.69%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.69% places GDS in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CIEN vs. GDS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCIENGDS
Return on Equity (TTM)3.72%19.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.87%5.88%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.46%41.75%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.66%21.69%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.94%21.12%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

3.40

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

CIEN’s Current Ratio of 3.40 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

GDS

1.47

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

GDS’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the IT Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CIEN vs. GDS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

0.55

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

CIEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.55 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GDS

1.75

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

GDS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.75. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CIEN vs. GDS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

3.65

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

In the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, CIEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.65 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GDS

0.66

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

GDS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.66 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

CIEN vs. GDS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCIENGDS
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.401.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.271.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.551.75
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.650.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

CIEN vs. GDS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CIEN vs. GDS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CIEN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CIEN vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CIEN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GDS

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GDS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CIEN vs. GDS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCIENGDS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

131.48

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

At 131.48, CIEN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GDS

11.54

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, GDS’s P/E Ratio of 11.54 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CIEN vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

3.23

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

CIEN’s P/S Ratio of 3.23 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GDS

4.82

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

GDS’s P/S Ratio of 4.82 is in the upper echelon for the IT Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CIEN vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

3.73

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

CIEN’s P/B Ratio of 3.73 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GDS

1.40

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

GDS’s P/B Ratio of 1.40 is in the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CIEN vs. GDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and IT Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCIENGDS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)131.4811.54
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.234.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.731.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.26--