Seek Returns logo

CIEN vs. FIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CIEN and FIS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCIENFIS
Company NameCiena CorporationFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentFinancial Services
Market Capitalization13.11 billion USD36.44 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 7, 1997June 20, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CIEN and FIS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CIEN vs. FIS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCIENFIS
5-Day Price Return6.16%0.29%
13-Week Price Return12.62%-12.77%
26-Week Price Return10.30%-0.14%
52-Week Price Return63.30%-13.22%
Month-to-Date Return-0.11%-12.16%
Year-to-Date Return9.35%-13.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.66M3.55M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.97M3.46M
3-Month Volatility40.76%26.83%
Beta1.061.08

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CIEN

3.72%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

CIEN’s Return on Equity of 3.72% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FIS

0.73%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 0.73% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CIEN vs. FIS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CIEN

2.46%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

CIEN’s Net Profit Margin of 2.46% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FIS

1.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.09% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CIEN vs. FIS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CIEN

4.67%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

CIEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.67% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FIS

17.58%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.58% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CIEN vs. FIS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCIENFIS
Return on Equity (TTM)3.72%0.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.87%0.33%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.46%1.09%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.67%17.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.94%36.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

3.40

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

CIEN’s Current Ratio of 3.40 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

FIS

0.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CIEN vs. FIS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

0.55

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

CIEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.55 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FIS

0.91

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CIEN vs. FIS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

3.66

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

In the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, CIEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.66 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FIS

6.19

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CIEN vs. FIS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCIENFIS
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.400.59
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.270.48
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.550.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.666.19

Growth

Revenue Growth

CIEN vs. FIS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CIEN vs. FIS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CIEN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FIS

2.27%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.27% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CIEN vs. FIS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CIEN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FIS

101.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 101.00% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CIEN vs. FIS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCIENFIS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.27%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%101.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

118.08

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

At 118.08, CIEN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FIS

323.87

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

At 323.87, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CIEN vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

2.91

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

CIEN’s P/S Ratio of 2.91 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FIS

3.52

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CIEN vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

3.73

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

CIEN’s P/B Ratio of 3.73 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FIS

3.02

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.02 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CIEN vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCIENFIS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)118.08323.87
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.913.52
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.733.02
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.3219.84