Seek Returns logo

CIEN vs. ERIC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CIEN and ERIC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CIEN is a standard domestic listing, while ERIC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCIENERIC
Company NameCiena CorporationTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
CountryUnited StatesSweden
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentCommunications Equipment
Market Capitalization12.25 billion USD25.74 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 7, 1997August 24, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CIEN and ERIC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CIEN vs. ERIC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCIENERIC
5-Day Price Return-5.23%1.36%
13-Week Price Return6.98%-10.72%
26-Week Price Return-2.49%-11.99%
52-Week Price Return60.62%1.44%
Month-to-Date Return-6.68%4.32%
Year-to-Date Return2.16%-17.20%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.63M3.48M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.96M6.34M
3-Month Volatility40.43%26.67%
Beta1.070.77

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CIEN

3.72%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

CIEN’s Return on Equity of 3.72% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ERIC

19.57%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

ERIC’s Return on Equity of 19.57% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CIEN vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Communications Equipment industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CIEN

2.46%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

CIEN’s Net Profit Margin of 2.46% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ERIC

7.04%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

ERIC’s Net Profit Margin of 7.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CIEN vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Communications Equipment industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CIEN

4.67%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

CIEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.67% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ERIC

10.60%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

ERIC’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.60% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CIEN vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Communications Equipment industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCIENERIC
Return on Equity (TTM)3.72%19.57%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.87%6.22%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.46%7.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.67%10.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.94%47.18%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

3.40

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

CIEN’s Current Ratio of 3.40 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

ERIC

1.09

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

ERIC’s Current Ratio of 1.09 falls into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CIEN vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Communications Equipment industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

0.55

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

CIEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.55 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ERIC

0.50

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

ERIC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CIEN vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Communications Equipment industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

3.66

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

In the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, CIEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.66 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ERIC

3.82

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

ERIC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.82 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CIEN vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Communications Equipment industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCIENERIC
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.401.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.270.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.550.50
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.663.82

Growth

Revenue Growth

CIEN vs. ERIC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CIEN vs. ERIC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CIEN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ERIC

3.73%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.73%, ERIC offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CIEN vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Communications Equipment industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CIEN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ERIC

70.91%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ERIC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 70.91% is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CIEN vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Communications Equipment industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCIENERIC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.73%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%70.91%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

118.08

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

At 118.08, CIEN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ERIC

14.44

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

In the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, ERIC’s P/E Ratio of 14.44 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CIEN vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Communications Equipment industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

2.91

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

CIEN’s P/S Ratio of 2.91 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ERIC

1.02

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

ERIC’s P/S Ratio of 1.02 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CIEN vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Communications Equipment industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

3.73

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

CIEN’s P/B Ratio of 3.73 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ERIC

3.15

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

ERIC’s P/B Ratio of 3.15 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CIEN vs. ERIC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Communications Equipment industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCIENERIC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)118.0814.44
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.911.02
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.733.15
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.326.44