CIB vs. RKT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 19, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CIB and RKT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CIB trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, RKT is a standard domestic listing.

Symbol	CIB	RKT
Company Name	Grupo Cibest S.A.	Rocket Companies, Inc.
Country	Colombia	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Banks	Financial Services
Market Capitalization	12.52 billion USD	41.41 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	July 26, 1995	August 6, 2020
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CIB and RKT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CIB vs. RKT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CIB	RKT
5-Day Price Return	0.67%	11.79%
13-Week Price Return	6.71%	68.12%
26-Week Price Return	2.79%	48.86%
52-Week Price Return	-27.92%	11.22%
Month-to-Date Return	2.90%	32.84%
Year-to-Date Return	-28.94%	74.25%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.05M	24.85M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.15M	16.45M
3-Month Volatility	--	58.51%
Beta	1.34	2.25

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CIB

15.44%

Banks Industry

Max: 26.37%
Q3: 15.92%
Median: 12.25%
Q1: 8.69%
Min: 0.15%

CIB’s Return on Equity of 15.44% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 40.58%
Q3: 20.06%
Median: 10.67%
Q1: 4.19%
Min: -10.31%

RKT has a negative Return on Equity of -0.01%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CIB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CIB

20.33%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.70%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.53%
Min: 6.98%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks industry, CIB’s Net Profit Margin of 20.33% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.86%
Q3: 25.58%
Median: 12.23%
Q1: 6.64%
Min: -9.92%

RKT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.01%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CIB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CIB

25.93%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.59%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 13.37%

CIB’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.93% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

RKT

13.77%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 77.28%
Q3: 37.68%
Median: 18.17%
Q1: 9.27%
Min: -8.19%

RKT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.77% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CIB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CIB	RKT
Return on Equity (TTM)	15.44%	-0.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)	1.76%	0.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	20.33%	-0.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	25.93%	13.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CIB

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

RKT

0.40

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.58
Q3: 2.59
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CIB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CIB

0.65

Banks Industry

Max: 4.75
Q3: 2.62
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

RKT

2.69

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.96
Q3: 2.10
Median: 0.57
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CIB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CIB

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

RKT

2.42

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CIB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CIB	RKT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	0.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	0.40
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.65	2.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	2.42

Growth

Revenue Growth

CIB vs. RKT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CIB vs. RKT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CIB

12.09%

Banks Industry

Max: 10.27%
Q3: 5.83%
Median: 3.81%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.00%

CIB’s Dividend Yield of 12.09% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Banks industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.18%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.56%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RKT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CIB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CIB

53.59%

Banks Industry

Max: 147.07%
Q3: 80.55%
Median: 54.40%
Q1: 35.71%
Min: 0.00%

CIB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 53.59% is within the typical range for the Banks industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 155.56%
Q3: 63.71%
Median: 18.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RKT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CIB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CIB	RKT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	12.09%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	53.59%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CIB

4.43

Banks Industry

Max: 20.05
Q3: 12.65
Median: 10.21
Q1: 7.54
Min: 2.74

In the lower quartile for the Banks industry, CIB’s P/E Ratio of 4.43 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

RKT

Financial Services Industry

Max: 63.23
Q3: 32.10
Median: 14.41
Q1: 10.81
Min: 0.37

P/E Ratio data for RKT is currently unavailable.

CIB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CIB

0.89

Banks Industry

Max: 5.06
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

RKT

0.97

Financial Services Industry

Max: 11.16
Q3: 5.45
Median: 2.61
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CIB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CIB

1.05

Banks Industry

Max: 2.18
Q3: 1.36
Median: 1.09
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.20

CIB’s P/B Ratio of 1.05 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RKT

3.81

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.09
Q3: 3.79
Median: 1.46
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.04

RKT’s P/B Ratio of 3.81 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CIB vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CIB	RKT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	4.43	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.89	0.97
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.05	3.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	1.86	2.73